Corestriction in degrees zero, one and two #
For a finite-index subgroup U of a group G acting on an abelian group M, the corestriction
attached to a transversal t : G ⧸ U → G is, in the three lowest degrees,
cor⁰_t(m) = ∑ u : G ⧸ U, t u • m,
(cor¹_t f) γ = ∑ u : G ⧸ U, t u • f (ℓᵗ_u γ),
(cor²_t f) (γ, η) = ∑ u : G ⧸ U, t u • f (ℓᵗ_u γ, ℓᵗ_{γ⁻¹ • u} η),
where ℓᵗ_u(γ) = (t u)⁻¹ * γ * t (γ⁻¹ • u) is the transversal word TauCeti.lWord. In degree
zero, if m is fixed by U then the sum is fixed by G; in degrees one and two, if f is a
cocycle on U then corⁱ_t f is a cocycle on G, and corⁱ_t carries coboundaries to
coboundaries. All three therefore descend to additive maps Hⁱ(U, M) → Hⁱ(G, M). The transversal
is kept variable until its independence has been proved, and the public maps explicitCor0,
explicitCor1 and explicitCor2 then use Quotient.out.
The factor t u • is essential for nontrivial coefficient actions. It is exactly the identity
t u * ℓᵗ_u(γ) = γ * t (γ⁻¹ • u) of TauCeti.transversal_mul_lWord that turns the U-cocycle
law for f into the G-cocycle law for cor¹_t f; without the action factor the sums are not
cocycles. A trivial-action formula that omits it is correct for trivial coefficients and wrong in
general.
Degree one is where the two normalizations start to differ from degree zero. Independence of the
transversal is no longer an equality of cochains but an explicit coboundary
(cochainsCor1_changeTransversal), and cor¹ ∘ res¹ is not the index on cochains either: it
differs from it by the coboundary of ∑ u, c (t u) (cochainsCor1_res). Only after passing to
cohomology do the clean statements explicitCor1_changeTransversal and explicitCor1_comp_res1
hold. Degree two repeats that pattern with longer correction terms: the two transversals differ
by the coboundary of γ ↦ ∑ u, t u • (f (d_u, ℓᵗ'_u γ) - f (ℓᵗ_u γ, d_{γ⁻¹ • u}))
(cochainsCor2_changeTransversal), and cor² ∘ res² differs from the index by the coboundary of
γ ↦ ∑ u, (c (t u, ℓᵗ_u γ) - c (γ, t u)) (cochainsCor2_res).
Continuity is needed only for the passage from cochains to H¹ and H², and only through
openness of U: TauCeti.continuous_lWord makes γ ↦ ℓᵗ_u(γ) continuous for an open U and
any map t, and TauCeti.continuous_lWord_inv_smul does the same for the second transversal
word of the degree-two sum, whose coset index moves with the first variable. So no continuity is
required of the transversal itself.
This is the degree-zero, degree-one and degree-two part of Layer 6 of the Profinite Cohomology
roadmap. The degree-zero formulas and proof organization are adapted from the earlier, unmerged
degree-zero portion of Tau Ceti PR #4061, which was removed there because the canonical H0
carrier had not yet landed.
Main declarations #
TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor0Transversal: the norm for a variable transversal.TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor0_changeTransversal: independence of that transversal.TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor0: the canonical degree-zero corestriction.TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor0_comp_res0: the normalizationcor⁰ ∘ res⁰ = (G : U) • id.TauCeti.ContCohomology.cochainsCor1: the degree-one corestriction cochain for a variable transversal, withcochainsCor1_isCocycle₁andcochainsCor1_mem_B1.TauCeti.ContCohomology.cochainsCor1_changeTransversalandTauCeti.ContCohomology.cochainsCor1_res: the two cochain-level correction terms.TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor1TransversalandTauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor1: degree-one corestriction onH¹, for a variable and for the canonical transversal.TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor1_comp_res1: the normalizationcor¹ ∘ res¹ = (G : U) • idonH¹.TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor1_explicitMap1_id: degree-one corestriction is natural in an equivariant coefficient map.TauCeti.ContCohomology.cochainsCor2: the degree-two corestriction cochain for a variable transversal, withcochainsCor2_isCocycle₂andcochainsCor2_mem_B2.TauCeti.ContCohomology.cochainsCor2_changeTransversalandTauCeti.ContCohomology.cochainsCor2_res: the two degree-two cochain-level correction terms.TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor2TransversalandTauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor2: degree-two corestriction onH², for a variable and for the canonical transversal.TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor2_comp_res2: the normalizationcor² ∘ res² = (G : U) • idonH².
References #
The normalization is Neukirch--Schmidt--Wingberg, Cohomology of Number Fields, 2nd ed., (1.5.7), and Serre, Local Fields, VII §7 Proposition 6. In positive degrees it is an identity of cohomology classes; in degree zero, a cocycle is already an invariant element.
The transversal norm of a U-invariant element is G-invariant.
Corestriction in degree zero for a variable transversal, the norm
m ↦ ∑ u, t u • m : H⁰(U, M) → H⁰(G, M).
Equations
- TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor0Transversal G M U t ht = { toFun := fun (m : ↥(TauCeti.ContCohomology.H0 (↥U) M)) => ⟨∑ u : G ⧸ U, t u • ↑m, ⋯⟩, map_zero' := ⋯, map_add' := ⋯ }
Instances For
The underlying coefficient of the transversal corestriction is its defining norm sum.
For a trivial coefficient action, the transversal norm is multiplication by the index.
Naturality of the transversal norm in an equivariant coefficient homomorphism.
cor⁰_t ∘ res⁰ = (G : U) • id for a variable transversal.
Independence of the transversal in degree zero. Two transversals differ by a U-valued
factor, which acts trivially on H⁰(U, M), so their norms agree on the nose.
Corestriction in degree zero, the canonical norm
m ↦ ∑ u, Quotient.out u • m : H⁰(U, M) → H⁰(G, M).
Equations
Instances For
The underlying coefficient of canonical degree-zero corestriction is the norm over
Quotient.out.
For a trivial coefficient action, canonical degree-zero corestriction is multiplication by the subgroup index.
The canonical degree-zero corestriction can be computed using any transversal.
Naturality of canonical degree-zero corestriction in an equivariant coefficient homomorphism.
cor⁰ ∘ res⁰ = (G : U) • id on H⁰(G, M).
The degree-one corestriction cochain #
No topology is needed to write cor¹_t down, to check that it carries 1-cocycles to
1-cocycles and 1-coboundaries to 1-coboundaries, or to compare two transversals. Continuity
enters only in the next section, where the cochain is pushed to H¹.
The degree-one corestriction cochain for a transversal t,
(cor¹_t f) γ = ∑ u : G ⧸ U, t u • f (ℓᵗ_u γ), where ℓᵗ is the transversal word
TauCeti.lWord, which lands in U by TauCeti.lWord_mem.
Equations
- TauCeti.ContCohomology.cochainsCor1 G M U t ht = { toFun := fun (f : ↥U → M) (γ : G) => ∑ u : G ⧸ U, t u • f ⟨TauCeti.lWord U t u γ, ⋯⟩, map_zero' := ⋯, map_add' := ⋯ }
Instances For
The defining formula for the degree-one corestriction cochain.
For a trivial coefficient action the representative factor t u • disappears, and the
degree-one corestriction is the plain sum of the values of the cochain on the transversal words.
Naturality of the degree-one corestriction cochain in an equivariant coefficient homomorphism.
The 1-cocycle law of a cochain c on G at the factorization
t (γ • u) * ℓᵗ_{γ • u}(γ) = γ * t u of TauCeti.transversal_smul_mul_lWord: the value of c at
the transversal word ℓᵗ_{γ • u}(γ), translated by t (γ • u), is
γ • c (t u) - c (t (γ • u)) + c γ.
The 1-cocycle law of a cochain f on U at the factorization
ℓᵗ_u(γ * η) = ℓᵗ_u(γ) * ℓᵗ_{γ⁻¹ • u}(η) of TauCeti.lWord_mul_lWord, translated by t u: the
translated value at ℓᵗ_u(γ * η) is the translated value at ℓᵗ_u(γ) plus the value at
ℓᵗ_{γ⁻¹ • u}(η) translated by γ * t (γ⁻¹ • u).
The corestriction of a 1-cocycle is a 1-cocycle. The factor t u • is what makes this
true: the transversal identity t u * ℓᵗ_u(γ) = γ * t (γ⁻¹ • u) of
TauCeti.transversal_mul_lWord is what converts the U-cocycle law for f into the G-cocycle
law for cor¹_t f, and the reindexed sum is what produces the leading γ •.
The degree-one corestriction of a coboundary is the coboundary of the degree-zero corestriction.
The degree-one corestriction cochain preserves 1-coboundaries.
Change of transversal in degree one, as an explicit coboundary. Two transversals give
corestriction cochains differing by d⁰ of the degree-zero corestriction of the values of f on
the transversal difference TauCeti.transversalDiff. Unlike in degree zero, the two cochains are
genuinely different; only their classes in H¹(G, M) agree.
cor¹_t ∘ res¹ on cochains, with its correction term: for a 1-cocycle c on G,
cor¹_t (res c) = (G : U) • c + d⁰ (∑ u, c (t u)). The correction term is genuinely there — unlike
in degree zero, cor ∘ res is not multiplication by the index on cochains — and it is a
coboundary, which is what makes TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor1_comp_res1 true on classes.
Corestriction on H¹ #
Openness of U makes every corestriction cochain continuous, so the cochain layer above descends
to H¹ = Z¹/B¹.
The corestriction of a continuous cochain along an open subgroup is continuous. Continuity
of the transversal t is not required: TauCeti.continuous_lWord needs only openness of U.
The degree-one corestriction cochain preserves continuous 1-cocycles.
Corestriction in degree one for a variable transversal, on continuous cocycles.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The underlying cochain of the corestriction of a continuous cocycle.
Corestriction in degree one for a variable transversal.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Degree-one corestriction sends the class of a continuous 1-cocycle to the class of its
corestriction cochain.
Independence of the transversal in degree one. Two transversals give the same map on
H¹(U, M), because by TauCeti.ContCohomology.cochainsCor1_changeTransversal their corestriction
cochains differ by a 1-coboundary.
Corestriction in degree one, at the canonical transversal Quotient.out.
Equations
Instances For
The canonical degree-one corestriction can be computed using any transversal.
Canonical degree-one corestriction sends the class of a continuous 1-cocycle to the class of
its corestriction cochain over Quotient.out.
cor¹_t ∘ res¹ = (G : U) • id on H¹(G, M), for a variable transversal. On cochains the
two sides differ by the coboundary recorded in TauCeti.ContCohomology.cochainsCor1_res.
cor¹ ∘ res¹ = (G : U) • id on H¹(G, M).
Degree-one corestriction is natural in the coefficients: for a continuous G-equivariant
f : M →+ N, applying f on H¹(U, -) and then corestricting agrees with corestricting and then
applying f. On cochains this is TauCeti.ContCohomology.map_cochainsCor1.
The degree-two corestriction cochain #
As in degree one, nothing in this section needs a topology: the 2-cocycle law for cor²_t, the
comparison of two transversals and the correction term of cor² ∘ res² are all identities of
plain cochains. Continuity enters only in the next section, where the cochain is pushed to H².
The degree-two corestriction cochain for a transversal t,
(cor²_t f) (γ, η) = ∑ u : G ⧸ U, t u • f (ℓᵗ_u γ, ℓᵗ_{γ⁻¹ • u} η).
Both transversal words lie in U by TauCeti.lWord_mem. The coset index of the second one is
translated by γ⁻¹, exactly as in the transversal cocycle law
TauCeti.lWord_mul_lWord; that translation is what makes the sum a 2-cocycle.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The defining formula for the degree-two corestriction cochain.
For a trivial coefficient action the representative factor t u • disappears, and the
degree-two corestriction is the plain sum of the values of the cochain on the transversal words.
Naturality of the degree-two corestriction cochain in an equivariant coefficient homomorphism.
The corestriction of a 2-cocycle is a 2-cocycle. The three arguments to which the
U-cocycle law of f is applied are ℓᵗ_u(γ), ℓᵗ_{γ⁻¹ • u}(η) and ℓᵗ_{(γη)⁻¹ • u}(ζ); their
two consecutive products are ℓᵗ_u(γη) and ℓᵗ_{γ⁻¹ • u}(ηζ) by
TauCeti.lWord_mul_lWord, which is what matches the four terms of the law with the four
corestriction sums. The leading γ • comes, as in degree one, from
TauCeti.transversal_mul_lWord together with a translation of the summation index.
The degree-two corestriction is a chain map: it turns the degree-one corestriction of a
1-cochain into the degree-two corestriction of its coboundary. This is the identity that carries
2-coboundaries to 2-coboundaries.
Change of transversal in degree two, as an explicit coboundary. Two transversals give
degree-two corestriction cochains differing by d¹ of the 1-cochain
γ ↦ ∑ u, t u • (f (d_u, ℓᵗ'_u γ) - f (ℓᵗ_u γ, d_{γ⁻¹ • u})),
built from the transversal difference TauCeti.transversalDiff. As in degree one the two cochains
are genuinely different; only their classes in H²(G, M) agree.
cor²_t ∘ res² on cochains, with its correction term: for a continuous 2-cocycle c on
G, cor²_t (res c) = (G : U) • c + d¹ k with
k γ = ∑ u, (c (t u, ℓᵗ_u γ) - c (γ, t u)).
The correction term is again genuinely there, and it is a coboundary, which is what makes
TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor2_comp_res2 true on classes.
Corestriction on H² #
Openness of U makes every degree-two corestriction cochain continuous — through
TauCeti.continuous_lWord and TauCeti.continuous_lWord_inv_smul, one for each of the two
transversal words — so the cochain layer above descends to H² = Z²/B².
Degree one needs separately continuous multiplication on G. This section uses the stronger bundled
IsTopologicalGroup G to obtain IsTopologicalGroup ↥U, which Z²(U, M) needs: B² is the
image of the continuous 1-cochains on U.
The degree-two corestriction of a continuous cochain along an open subgroup is continuous.
As in degree one, no continuity is required of the transversal t.
The degree-two corestriction cochain preserves continuous 2-cocycles.
The degree-two corestriction cochain preserves 2-coboundaries: by
TauCeti.ContCohomology.cochainsCor2_d1 it sends d¹ c to d¹ of the degree-one corestriction of
c, which is continuous because U is open.
Corestriction in degree two for a variable transversal, on continuous cocycles.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The underlying cochain of the corestriction of a continuous 2-cocycle.
Corestriction in degree two for a variable transversal.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Degree-two corestriction sends the class of a continuous 2-cocycle to the class of its
corestriction cochain.
Independence of the transversal in degree two. Two transversals give the same map on
H²(U, M), because by TauCeti.ContCohomology.cochainsCor2_changeTransversal their corestriction
cochains differ by a 2-coboundary.
Corestriction in degree two, at the canonical transversal Quotient.out.
Equations
Instances For
The canonical degree-two corestriction can be computed using any transversal.
Canonical degree-two corestriction sends the class of a continuous 2-cocycle to the class of
its corestriction cochain over Quotient.out.
cor²_t ∘ res² = (G : U) • id on H²(G, M), for a variable transversal. On cochains the
two sides differ by the coboundary recorded in TauCeti.ContCohomology.cochainsCor2_res.
cor² ∘ res² = (G : U) • id on H²(G, M).