The index-two exact sequence of restriction and corestriction #
Let U be an open subgroup of index two in a profinite group G, and let M be a discrete
G-module killed by two. The coinduction unit and the trace form the short exact sequence
0 → M → Coind_U^G M → M → 0 (TauCeti.DiscreteCoind.indexTwoShortExact). Shapiro's isomorphism
Hⁿ(G, Coind_U^G M) ≅ Hⁿ(U, M) turns the coefficient map of the unit into restriction and the
coefficient map of the trace into corestriction, so the long exact sequence of continuous
cohomology becomes
⋯ → Hⁿ(G, M) --res--> Hⁿ(U, M) --cor--> Hⁿ(G, M) --δ--> Hⁿ⁺¹(G, M) --res--> Hⁿ⁺¹(U, M) → ⋯
in every degree, where δ is the connecting map of the coefficient sequence. This file proves
exactness at its three repeating nodes and specializes exactness at Hⁿ(U, M) to trivial 𝔽₂
coefficients. On the explicit low-degree model, the degree-zero connecting map of the same
sequence sends 1 ∈ H⁰(G, 𝔽₂) to the character of G with kernel U
(TauCeti.ContCohomology.indexTwoShortExact_explicitDelta0).
Index exactly two is needed: at index two the kernel of the trace on Coind_U^G M is the image
of the unit (TauCeti.DiscreteCoind.trace_eq_zero_iff_exists_unit_of_index_two), which fails at
larger index. For S₃ ⊇ C₂ with trivial 𝔽₂ coefficients, restriction and corestriction in
degree one are both surjective, so the composite sequence cannot be exact at H¹(C₂, 𝔽₂).
Main results #
TauCeti.ContinuousCohomology.exact_res_corestriction_of_index_two: exactness atHⁿ(U, M), the image of restriction is the kernel of corestriction.TauCeti.ContinuousCohomology.exact_corestriction_delta_of_index_two: exactness atHⁿ(G, M), the image of corestriction is the kernel ofδ.TauCeti.ContinuousCohomology.exact_delta_res_of_index_two: exactness atHⁿ⁺¹(G, M), the image ofδis the kernel of restriction.TauCeti.exact_trivialF2ResMap_trivialF2CorMap_of_index_two: exactness atHⁿ(U, 𝔽₂)for trivial𝔽₂coefficients.
References #
- J. Kr. Arason, Cohomologische Invarianten quadratischer Formen, J. Algebra 36 (1975), 448–491, the exact sequence of a quadratic extension.
- A. Kozlowski, The Evens–Kahn formula for the total Stiefel–Whitney class, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 91 (1984), 309–313, Lemma 2.4.
- J. Neukirch, A. Schmidt, K. Wingberg, Cohomology of Number Fields, 2nd ed., (1.3.2).
Exactness at Hⁿ(U, M) for an open subgroup U of index two and a discrete G-module
M killed by two: a class of Hⁿ(U, M) has zero corestriction exactly when it is a
restriction.
Exactness at Hⁿ(G, M) for an open subgroup U of index two and a discrete G-module
M killed by two: a class of Hⁿ(G, M) is a corestriction exactly when the connecting map δ
of the coefficient sequence 0 → M → Coind_U^G M → M → 0 kills it.
Exactness at Hⁿ⁺¹(G, M) for an open subgroup U of index two and a discrete G-module
M killed by two: a class of Hⁿ⁺¹(G, M) restricts to zero on U exactly when it is in the
image of the connecting map δ of the coefficient sequence 0 → M → Coind_U^G M → M → 0.
Exactness at Hⁿ(U, 𝔽₂) for an open subgroup U of index two and trivial 𝔽₂
coefficients: a class of Hⁿ(U, 𝔽₂) has zero corestriction exactly when it is a restriction.