Cohomology of modules coinduced from the trivial subgroup #
By Shapiro's lemma, the representation Coind_⊥^G X coinduced from the trivial subgroup has
vanishing cohomology in positive degrees (Milne, Class Field Theory, II 1.11–1.12), and so does
its restriction to any subgroup S, since that restriction is again coinduced from the trivial
subgroup (Rep.resCoindBotIso). For a normal subgroup S, the same holds for its S-invariants
as a representation of G ⧸ S, which are coinduced from the trivial subgroup of G ⧸ S
(Rep.quotientToInvariantsCoindBotIso).
The statements follow ClassFieldTheory/Cohomology/IndCoind/TrivialCohomology.lean in
kbuzzard/ClassFieldTheory, commit ccc3323c6750abca25b49b35106f54eb3a398509.
Main statements #
groupCohomology.isZero_coindBot_succ:Hⁿ⁺¹(G, Coind_⊥^G X) = 0.groupCohomology.isZero_res_coindBot_succ:Hⁿ⁺¹(S, Coind_⊥^G X) = 0for every subgroupS ≤ G.TauCeti.groupCohomology.isZero_quotientToInvariants_coindBot_succ:Hⁿ⁺¹(G ⧸ S, (Coind_⊥^G X)^S) = 0for every normal subgroupS ≤ G.
References #
- J. S. Milne, Class Field Theory, Chapter II, §1.
- K. S. Brown, Cohomology of Groups, Chapter III, §6.
Positive-degree cohomology of a representation coinduced from the trivial subgroup vanishes
(Milne II 1.12). Unlike the Tate analogue TauCeti.TateCohomology.isZero_coindBot, no finiteness
is needed.
Positive-degree cohomology of the restriction to a subgroup of a representation coinduced from
the trivial subgroup vanishes. Unlike the Tate analogue
TauCeti.TateCohomology.isZero_res_coindBot, no finiteness is needed.
The S-invariants of Coind_⊥^G X have no cohomology over G ⧸ S in positive degrees: they
are coinduced from the trivial subgroup of G ⧸ S.