Documentation

TauCeti.RepresentationTheory.Homological.GroupCohomology.Corestriction

Corestriction in group cohomology #

Let S be a subgroup of finite index in a group G and A a G-representation. The corestriction (or transfer) is the map

cor : Hⁿ(S, Res_S A) ⟶ Hⁿ(G, A)

in every degree n, going the opposite way to restriction. It is defined through Shapiro's lemma as the composite

Hⁿ(S, Res_S A) ≅ Hⁿ(G, Coind_S^G Res_S A) ⟶ Hⁿ(G, A)

of the inverse of Mathlib's Shapiro isomorphism groupCohomology.coindIso and the map induced by the trace Coind_S^G Res_S A ⟶ A, f ↦ ∑ g⁻¹ • f g over representatives of the right cosets of S, which is the counit of the finite-index adjunction Rep.coindResAdjunction. The finiteness of the index is used only for the trace.

The basic properties are proved here in every degree: corestriction is natural in the coefficients, and corestriction after restriction is multiplication by the index, cor ∘ res = [G : S]. The latter is obtained by identifying Shapiro's isomorphism with restriction followed by evaluation at 1 (TauCeti.groupCohomology.coindIso_hom): restriction then becomes the map induced by the unit A ⟶ Coind_S^G Res_S A, and the unit followed by the trace is [G : S]. Finally, corestriction is transitive along a tower A ↪ B ↪ C of embeddings with images of finite index.

Corestriction is the map along which cohomological invariants are pushed from a subgroup to the whole group; in class field theory it is the cohomological counterpart of the norm, and the normalization cor ∘ res = [G : S] is what relates the invariants of a layer to those of its restrictions.

Main definitions #

Main results #

References #

Corestriction in group cohomology, natural in the coefficients: for a finite-index subgroup S ≤ G, the map Hⁿ(S, Res_S A) ⟶ Hⁿ(G, A) obtained from Shapiro's isomorphism Hⁿ(S, Res_S A) ≅ Hⁿ(G, Coind_S^G Res_S A) and the trace Coind_S^G Res_S A ⟶ A.

Equations
Instances For

    Corestriction Hⁿ(S, Res_S A) ⟶ Hⁿ(G, A) along a finite-index subgroup S ≤ G.

    Equations
    Instances For
      @[simp]

      The component at A of the corestriction natural transformation is corestriction S A n.

      Corestriction through Shapiro's lemma. Precomposed with Shapiro's isomorphism Hⁿ(G, Coind_S^G Res_S A) ≅ Hⁿ(S, Res_S A), corestriction is the map induced by the trace Coind_S^G Res_S A ⟶ A, the counit of Rep.coindResAdjunction.

      Corestriction after restriction is multiplication by the index: for a finite-index subgroup S ≤ G, the composite Hⁿ(G, A) ⟶ Hⁿ(S, Res_S A) ⟶ Hⁿ(G, A) of restriction and corestriction is [G : S] times the identity, in every degree n.

      Corestriction after restriction is multiplication by the index: for a finite-index subgroup S ≤ G, the composite Hⁿ(G, A) ⟶ Hⁿ(S, Res_S A) ⟶ Hⁿ(G, A) of restriction and corestriction is [G : S] times the identity, in every degree n.

      Corestriction after restriction is multiplication by the index: for a finite-index subgroup S ≤ G, the composite Hⁿ(G, A) ⟶ Hⁿ(S, Res_S A) ⟶ Hⁿ(G, A) of restriction and corestriction is [G : S] times the identity, in every degree n.

      A class in Hⁿ(G, A) whose restriction to the finite-index subgroup S vanishes is killed by the index of S.

      Corestriction from a finite-index subgroup commutes with the connecting maps of any short exact sequence of representations, in every ordinary cohomological degree.

      Corestriction from a finite-index subgroup commutes with the connecting maps of any short exact sequence of representations, in every ordinary cohomological degree.

      Transitivity #

      Transitivity of corestriction. Let φ₁ : A →* B and φ₂ : B →* C be injective with images of finite index, and let φ₃ = φ₂.comp φ₁. Identify each group with its image through MonoidHom.ofInjective. Then corestriction from A to B, followed by corestriction from B to C, is corestriction from A to C:

      Hⁿ(A, M) ⟶ Hⁿ(B, M) ⟶ Hⁿ(C, M) equals Hⁿ(A, M) ⟶ Hⁿ(C, M).

      The composite φ₃ is a separate argument, related to φ₂.comp φ₁ by the equation h, so the statement applies when the composite is only propositionally equal to a given homomorphism. This is the transitivity result described in Brown, Chapter III, §9, and Neukirch--Schmidt--Wingberg, Chapter I, §5.

      theorem groupCohomology.natCard_nsmul_eq_zero {k G : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] [Finite G] {A : Rep.{u, u, u} k G} {n : ℕ} (x : ↑(groupCohomology A (n + 1))) :
      Nat.card G • x = 0

      Positive-degree cohomology of a finite group is killed by the order of the group (Milne II 1.31).

      Under the degree-zero identification with invariants, corestriction is the relative norm. The quotient Fintype is explicit so that the relative norm uses the caller's coset enumeration.

      Under the degree-zero identification with invariants, corestriction is the relative norm. The quotient Fintype is explicit so that the relative norm uses the caller's coset enumeration.