Homology of modules induced from the trivial subgroup #
By Shapiro's lemma, the representation Ind_⊥^G X induced from the trivial subgroup has vanishing
homology in positive degrees, and so does its restriction to any subgroup S, since that
restriction is again induced from the trivial subgroup (Rep.resIndBotIso).
The statements follow ClassFieldTheory/Cohomology/IndCoind/TrivialCohomology.lean in
kbuzzard/ClassFieldTheory, commit ccc3323c6750abca25b49b35106f54eb3a398509.
Main statements #
groupHomology.isZero_indBot_succ:Hₙ₊₁(G, Ind_⊥^G X) = 0.groupHomology.isZero_res_indBot_succ:Hₙ₊₁(S, Ind_⊥^G X) = 0for every subgroupS ≤ G.TauCeti.groupHomology.isZero_res_leftRegular_succ:Hₙ₊₁(S, k[G]) = 0for every subgroup.
References #
- K. S. Brown, Cohomology of Groups, Chapter III, §6.
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Section 6.3.
Positive-degree homology of a representation induced from the trivial subgroup vanishes (Weibel
6.3.3). Unlike the Tate analogue TauCeti.TateCohomology.isZero_indBot, no finiteness is needed.
Positive-degree homology of the restriction to a subgroup of a representation induced from the
trivial subgroup vanishes. Unlike the Tate analogue TauCeti.TateCohomology.isZero_res_indBot, no
finiteness is needed.
Positive-degree homology of a subgroup with coefficients in the restricted left regular representation vanishes, without any finiteness assumption.