The inverse of Shapiro's isomorphism in homology is the corestriction of the unit #
For a subgroup S ≤ G and an S-representation A, Mathlib's homological Shapiro isomorphism
groupHomology.indIso A n : Hₙ(G, Ind_S^G A) ≅ Hₙ(S, A) is constructed through Tor: it compares
the bar resolution of S with the restriction to S of the bar resolution of G. This file
identifies its inverse with an explicit map. It is the change-of-group map
Hₙ(S, A) ⟶ Hₙ(G, Ind_S^G A)
along S ≤ G, induced by the unit A ⟶ Res_S Ind_S^G A, a ↦ 1 ⊗ a, of induction–restriction.
On inhomogeneous chains it sends a · (s₁, …, sₙ) to (1 ⊗ a) · (s₁, …, sₙ).
The explicit form is what makes Shapiro's isomorphism usable against the rest of Mathlib's
functoriality: its inverse is a groupHomology.map, so it composes with corestriction and
coefficient maps by groupHomology.map_comp. In particular, corestriction from S to G becomes
the map induced by the counit Ind_S^G Res_S B ⟶ B, which is what gives the homological transfer
the normalization cor ∘ res = [G : S].
This is the homological counterpart of TauCeti.groupCohomology.coindIso_hom.
Main results #
TauCeti.groupHomology.indIso_inv:(indIso A n).invisgroupHomology.map S.subtype ((indResAdjunction k S.subtype).unit.app A) n.TauCeti.groupHomology.indIso_inv_comp_map_counit: read through Shapiro's isomorphism, corestriction fromStoGis the map induced by the counitInd_S^G Res_S B ⟶ B.TauCeti.groupHomology.indIso_inv_naturality,TauCeti.groupHomology.indIso_hom_naturality: Shapiro's isomorphism is natural in the coefficients.
References #
- K. S. Brown, Cohomology of Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 87, Springer (1982), Chapter III, §6 (Shapiro's lemma) and Chapter III, §8.
The inverse of Shapiro's isomorphism in homology is corestriction of the unit. The
inverse of the isomorphism Hₙ(G, Ind_S^G A) ≅ Hₙ(S, A) of groupHomology.indIso is the
change-of-group map along S ≤ G induced by the unit A ⟶ Res_S Ind_S^G A, a ↦ 1 ⊗ a,
of induction–restriction. The DecidableEq G instance is the one used by Mathlib's indIso;
keeping it caller-supplied ensures that this equality rewrites the caller's isomorphism.
Corestriction through Shapiro's lemma. For a G-representation B, the inverse of
Shapiro's isomorphism Hₙ(G, Ind_S^G Res_S B) ≅ Hₙ(S, Res_S B) followed by the map induced by the
counit Ind_S^G Res_S B ⟶ B of induction–restriction is corestriction
Hₙ(S, Res_S B) ⟶ Hₙ(G, B).
Corestriction through Shapiro's lemma. For a G-representation B, the inverse of
Shapiro's isomorphism Hₙ(G, Ind_S^G Res_S B) ≅ Hₙ(S, Res_S B) followed by the map induced by the
counit Ind_S^G Res_S B ⟶ B of induction–restriction is corestriction
Hₙ(S, Res_S B) ⟶ Hₙ(G, B).
The inverse of Shapiro's isomorphism is natural in the coefficients: for a morphism
φ : A ⟶ B of S-representations, it intertwines the maps induced by φ and by Ind_S^G φ.
The inverse of Shapiro's isomorphism is natural in the coefficients: for a morphism
φ : A ⟶ B of S-representations, it intertwines the maps induced by φ and by Ind_S^G φ.
Shapiro's isomorphism is natural in the coefficients: indIso_inv_naturality for
(indIso S A n).hom.
Shapiro's isomorphism is natural in the coefficients: indIso_inv_naturality for
(indIso S A n).hom.