The projection formula for induced representations #
For a group homomorphism φ : G →* H, a G-representation A and an H-representation B, the
projection formula (or tensor identity) is the isomorphism of H-representations
Ind_φ (A ⊗ Res_φ B) ≅ (Ind_φ A) ⊗ B.
It says that induction is a morphism of modules over the representation ring of H: an induced
representation may be tensored with an H-representation either before or after inducing.
Mathlib has only the shadow of this statement obtained by taking H-coinvariants of both sides,
Rep.coinvariantsTensorIndNatIso, which it uses for Shapiro's lemma. The isomorphism of
representations itself is not a formal consequence of the induction--restriction adjunction:
Representation.ind is built as the coinvariants of k[H] ⊗[k] A, so the map has to be produced
by hand on representatives and then shown to descend and to be equivariant. That is what this file
does, over an arbitrary commutative ring, at the generality of a group homomorphism rather than a
subgroup inclusion.
The two directions are
⟦h ⊗ₜ (a ⊗ₜ b)⟧ ↦ ⟦h ⊗ₜ a⟧ ⊗ₜ ρ_B(h⁻¹) b, ⟦h ⊗ₜ a⟧ ⊗ₜ b ↦ ⟦h ⊗ₜ (a ⊗ₜ ρ_B(h) b)⟧.
The inverse h⁻¹ is not decorative. In Mathlib's model, g : G identifies h ⊗ₜ (a ⊗ₜ b) with
φ(g)h ⊗ₜ (ρ_A(g) a ⊗ₜ ρ_B(φ g) b), so a twist ρ_B(f h) by a function f : H → H descends to
the coinvariants as soon as f (φ(g) h) · φ(g) = f h for all g and h — a condition on f
alone, which does not mention B. The canonical solution is f h = h⁻¹, and it is also the one
that makes the map H-equivariant, because H acts on Ind_φ A by
h₁ • ⟦h ⊗ₜ a⟧ = ⟦h h₁⁻¹ ⊗ₜ a⟧.
Main definitions #
TauCeti.indProjection: the projection formula,Rep.ind φ (X ⊗ Rep.res φ Y) ≅ Rep.ind φ X ⊗ YinRep k H.TauCeti.indProjectionEquiv,TauCeti.indProjectionLEquiv: the same isomorphism as an equivalence ofRepresentations and as ak-linear equivalence of the underlying modules, built from the two explicit mapsTauCeti.indProjectionHomandTauCeti.indProjectionInv.TauCeti.indProjectionNatIsoLeft,TauCeti.indProjectionNatIsoRight: the projection formula as a natural isomorphism of functors, in the left tensor factor (theRep k Gargument) and in the right one (theRep k Hargument) respectively.
The classical corollary for a subgroup S ≤ G, Ind_S^G (Res_S^G Y) ≅ k[G ⧸ S] ⊗ Y, needs the
identification of Ind_S^G (trivial) with the permutation representation and therefore lives
downstream, as TauCeti.indResProjection in
TauCeti/RepresentationTheory/Induction/Permutation.lean.
Main statements #
TauCeti.indProjectionHom_apply_mk,TauCeti.indProjectionInv_apply_mk: the twok-linear maps on generators. Every proof below about the projection formula goes through these two rules rather than through the definitions.TauCeti.indProjection_hom_hom_apply,TauCeti.indProjection_inv_hom_apply: the two directions of theRep k Hisomorphism on generators.TauCeti.indProjection_hom_naturality_left,TauCeti.indProjection_hom_naturality_right: naturality in each variable.TauCeti.coinvariantsTensorIndHom_map_indProjection_mk: the comparison with Mathlib's coinvariants shadow. TakingH-coinvariants ofindProjectionand following with Mathlib'sRep.coinvariantsTensorIndHomsends⟦⟦h ⊗ₜ z⟧⟧to⟦z⟧, with no trace ofhleft.
Implementation notes #
Representation.IndV.mk φ ρ h is a reducible abbreviation for
Coinvariants.mk _ ∘ₗ TensorProduct.mk k _ _ (MonoidAlgebra.single h 1), which simp unfolds.
The generator lemmas below are therefore stated with IndV.mk, the readable form, but are not
simp lemmas: their left-hand sides are not in simp-normal form and they never fire. This
matches Mathlib's own Rep.coinvariantsTensorIndHom_mk_tmul_indVMk. They are applied by
explicit rw/Eq.trans instead, so that
only the two definitions TauCeti.indProjectionHom and TauCeti.indProjectionInv are ever
unfolded, and only in their own generator lemmas. For the same reason the proofs below reach the
generators by an explicit Representation.IndV.hom_ext/TensorProduct.ext' chain and peel the
resulting compositions one at a time with LinearMap.comp_apply under conv_lhs/conv_rhs: an
unrestricted ext/simp step also unfolds IndV.mk, after which the generator lemmas no longer
match.
The Representation-level constructions are universe-polymorphic in k, G, H and the two
carrier modules. The Rep k H layer is not, and cannot be: Rep.{w} k G is monoidal only for
w the universe of k (ModuleCat.monoidalCategory is stated for ModuleCat.{u} R with
R : Type u), while Rep.ind φ lands in Rep.{max u v' w} k H for H : Type v'. Tensoring
Rep.ind φ X with Y therefore forces H into the universe of k, exactly as in Mathlib's own
Rep.coinvariantsTensorIndHom section; only the source group G stays free.
References #
This is the projection formula of Layer 0 in
TauCetiRoadmap/RepresentationTheory/InductionRestriction/README.md, whose Suggested.lean
records it as indProjection. See J.-P. Serre, Linear Representations of Finite Groups, §3.3,
and C. W. Curtis, I. Reiner, Methods of Representation Theory, Vol. I, §10.
The forward map of the projection formula, ⟦h ⊗ₜ (a ⊗ₜ b)⟧ ↦ ⟦h ⊗ₜ a⟧ ⊗ₜ τ(h⁻¹) b. The
twist by τ h⁻¹ is what makes the expression independent of the representative: it undoes the
translation of the group coordinate recorded by Representation.Coinvariants.mk_self_apply.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
TauCeti.indProjectionHom on generators. This is the only place the definition is unfolded;
every later proof rewrites with this rule instead.
The backward map of the projection formula, ⟦h ⊗ₜ a⟧ ⊗ₜ b ↦ ⟦h ⊗ₜ (a ⊗ₜ τ(h) b)⟧.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
TauCeti.indProjectionInv on generators. This is the only place the definition is unfolded;
every later proof rewrites with this rule instead.
The projection formula as a k-linear equivalence of the underlying modules: the two maps
above are mutually inverse because τ h and τ h⁻¹ cancel.
Equations
- TauCeti.indProjectionLEquiv φ ρ τ = LinearEquiv.ofLinearMap (TauCeti.indProjectionHom φ ρ τ) (TauCeti.indProjectionInv φ ρ τ) ⋯ ⋯
Instances For
TauCeti.indProjectionLEquiv is TauCeti.indProjectionHom in the forward direction.
The projection formula as an equivalence of representations. Equivariance is the computation
(h h₁⁻¹)⁻¹ = h₁ h⁻¹: translating the group coordinate on the induced side by h₁⁻¹ on the right
is matched by acting with h₁ on the second tensor factor.
Equations
Instances For
The projection formula in Rep k H: inducing a representation tensored with a restricted
one is the induced representation tensored with the original,
Ind_φ (X ⊗ Res_φ Y) ≅ (Ind_φ X) ⊗ Y.
Equations
- TauCeti.indProjection φ X Y = Rep.mkIso (TauCeti.indProjectionEquiv φ X.ρ Y.ρ)
Instances For
The forward direction of TauCeti.indProjection on generators. Not a simp lemma: simp
unfolds the reducible Representation.IndV.mk, so the left-hand side is not in simp-normal
form.
The backward direction of TauCeti.indProjection on generators.
The projection formula is natural in the left tensor factor, the Rep k G argument.
The projection formula is natural in the right tensor factor, the Rep k H argument.
The projection formula as a natural isomorphism in the left tensor factor: the functors
X ↦ Ind_φ (X ⊗ Res_φ Y) and X ↦ (Ind_φ X) ⊗ Y from Rep k G to Rep k H agree.
Equations
- TauCeti.indProjectionNatIsoLeft φ Y = CategoryTheory.NatIso.ofComponents (fun (X : Rep k G) => TauCeti.indProjection φ X Y) ⋯
Instances For
The projection formula as a natural isomorphism in the right tensor factor: the endofunctors
Y ↦ Ind_φ (X ⊗ Res_φ Y) and Y ↦ (Ind_φ X) ⊗ Y of Rep k H agree. This is the shape of
Mathlib's coinvariants version Rep.coinvariantsTensorIndNatIso.
Equations
Instances For
The comparison with Mathlib's coinvariants shadow. Applying H-coinvariants to
TauCeti.indProjection and composing with Rep.coinvariantsTensorIndHom sends the class of a
generator ⟦h ⊗ₜ z⟧ to ⟦z⟧, with no trace of h left: the twist Y.ρ h⁻¹ introduced by the
projection formula is absorbed by the coinvariants relation.
This computes that one composite on generators; it is not an equality of the two isomorphisms,
which do not have the same source and target: Rep.coinvariantsTensorIndHom runs from the
coinvariants of (Ind_φ X) ⊗ Y to the coinvariants of X ⊗ Res_φ Y downstairs, while
TauCeti.indProjection is an isomorphism in Rep k H upstairs.