James's submodule theorem, and the irreducibility of the Specht module #
Every subrepresentation U of the Young permutation module M^μ is comparable with the Specht
module S^μ in a very strong sense: either S^μ ≤ U, or U is orthogonal to S^μ for the
tabloid form. This dichotomy is James's submodule theorem, and it is proved here
(TauCeti.spechtSubrepresentation_le_or_le_orthogonal). Since the tabloid form is positive
definite, the two alternatives overlap only on the zero subrepresentation, so the theorem
immediately makes S^μ an atom of the lattice of subrepresentations of M^μ, hence irreducible.
The engine is the behaviour of the column antisymmetrizer b_t on a single tabloid, which is
James's Lemma 4.6: b_t · {s} is either 0 or ± e_t
(TauCeti.YoungTableau.exists_eq_smul_polytabloid_single). Writing {s} = σ · {t}, the two cases
are exactly the two cases of the row/column criterion of
TauCeti.RepresentationTheory.Symmetric.Vanishing, read with the roles of the two tableaux
exchanged.
- If a row of
relabel σ tmeets a column oftin two distinct labelsx ≠ y, then the transposition ofxandylies in the column group oftwhile fixing the tabloid{s}, so pushing it across turnsb_t · {s}into its own negative and kills it. - Otherwise the row-column factorization of
TauCeti.RepresentationTheory.Symmetric.Factorizationwritesσ⁻¹ = p qwithpin the row group andqin the column group oft. The row group is the stabilizer of{t}, so{s} = q⁻¹ · {t}, andb_tabsorbsq⁻¹through its sign:b_t · {s} = sign q • e_t.
By linearity the same holds for an arbitrary vector of M^μ
(TauCeti.YoungTableau.exists_eq_smul_polytabloid), and that is the dichotomy. Given a
subrepresentation U, either some b_t fails to annihilate some vector of U -- and then e_t
itself lies in U, and with it the span of its orbit, which is all of S^μ -- or every b_t
annihilates every vector of U, and then U is orthogonal to every polytabloid, because b_t is
self-adjoint for the tabloid form
(TauCeti.YoungTableau.tabloidForm_asAlgebraHom_columnAntisymmetrizer) and e_t = b_t · {t}.
The dimension of S^μ, the standard basis of polytabloids indexing it, and the statement that
the S^μ exhaust the irreducibles of Sₙ and are pairwise non-isomorphic are not proved here.
Neither is the comparison of S^μ with the left ideal ℚ[Sₙ] c_t, which is
irreducible by
TauCeti.YoungTableau.isIrreducible_spechtIdealRep through an argument that shares the row-column
factorization but not the tabloid form.
Main results #
TauCeti.YoungTableau.exists_eq_smul_polytabloid_single: the column antisymmetrizer sends a tabloid to a multiple of the polytabloid (James's Lemma 4.6), andTauCeti.YoungTableau.exists_eq_smul_polytabloidextends this to all ofM^μ.TauCeti.YoungTableau.tabloidForm_asAlgebraHom_columnAntisymmetrizer: the column antisymmetrizer is self-adjoint for the tabloid form.TauCeti.spechtSubrepresentation_le_or_le_orthogonal: James's submodule theorem.TauCeti.isAtom_spechtSubrepresentationandTauCeti.isIrreducible_spechtSubrepresentation: the Specht module is a minimal subrepresentation ofM^μ, hence irreducible, withTauCeti.isIrreducible_spechtModulethe partition-indexed form.
References #
- G. D. James, The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Groups, Chapter 4: Lemma 4.6, the submodule theorem 4.8, and Corollary 4.9.
- B. E. Sagan, The Symmetric Group, 2nd ed. (2001), Section 2.4.
James's lemma: the column antisymmetrizer of a tabloid #
James's Lemma 4.6. The column antisymmetrizer of t sends a μ-tabloid to a rational
multiple of the polytabloid e_t; the multiple is 0 or a sign.
The tabloid is σ · {t} for some σ, and the two cases are the two cases of the row/column
criterion: if a row of relabel σ t meets a column of t twice the transposition of the two
shared labels fixes the tabloid while b_t sees its sign, and otherwise σ⁻¹ factors through the
row and column groups of t, of which the row part fixes {t}.
The column antisymmetrizer collapses M^μ onto the line spanned by the polytabloid. This
is the linear extension of TauCeti.YoungTableau.exists_eq_smul_polytabloid_single from the
tabloid basis to the whole Young permutation module.
Self-adjointness of the column antisymmetrizer #
The column antisymmetrizer is self-adjoint for the tabloid form. The symmetric group acts
on M^μ by isometries, so moving a permutation across the form inverts it, and inversion is a
sign-preserving involution of the column group.
The submodule theorem #
James's submodule theorem. A subrepresentation U of the Young permutation module M^μ
either contains the Specht module S^μ or is orthogonal to it for the tabloid form.
The dichotomy is whether some column antisymmetrizer b_t fails to annihilate some vector of U.
If it does fail, the value is a nonzero multiple of the polytabloid e_t and lies in U, so U
contains the orbit of e_t, which spans S^μ. If every b_t annihilates every vector of U,
then self-adjointness of b_t moves it off each polytabloid e_t = b_t · {t} and onto the vector
of U, where it vanishes.
Irreducibility #
The Specht module is a minimal subrepresentation of M^μ. A nonzero subrepresentation
strictly inside S^μ would, by the submodule theorem, be orthogonal to S^μ while lying in it,
and the tabloid form is positive definite.
The Specht module is irreducible. This is James's Corollary 4.9 over a field of
characteristic zero, in the concrete presentation of S^μ as the span of the polytabloids inside
the Young permutation module.
The Specht module of a partition is irreducible, in the partition-indexed packaging
TauCeti.spechtModule. Transporting along the relabelling Fin n ≃ Fin (diagramOf μ).card is an
isomorphism of groups, and restriction along an isomorphism preserves irreducibility.