Strong noetherianness of a completed rational localisation #
Two results, one about the carrier of a presentation and one about the ring it presents.
Carrier-independence. A presentation (T, s) of a rational localisation is carried by some
localisation S of A at s, and the choice is immaterial: two carriers of the same
presentation have isomorphic completions. Strong noetherianness therefore depends on the
presentation alone.
Strong noetherianity itself. When A is a strongly noetherian Tate ring and the numerators
generate the unit ideal together with s, the completion A⟨T/s⟩ is again strongly noetherian.
The route is the presentation: A⟨T/s⟩ is strictly topologically of finite type over A
(TauCeti.Huber.PairOfDefinition.isStrictlyTopologicallyFiniteType_toCompletionLoc), and strong
noetherianity travels along such a presentation. This is what a caller needs in order to iterate
the construction, and hence what the sheaf condition for a strongly noetherian Huber pair rests
on.
Nothing here is specific to Laurent presentations or to enlarging the numerator set; those live
in TauCeti.RingTheory.Huber.LocalizationTopology.Laurent.StronglyNoetherian, which consumes
this.
Main results #
TauCeti.Huber.PairOfDefinition.isStronglyNoetherian_completion_self: the carrier does not matter.TauCeti.Huber.PairOfDefinition.isStronglyNoetherian_completion: a rational localisation of a strongly noetherian Tate ring is strongly noetherian.
Strong noetherianness does not depend on which localisation carries a presentation. Two
presentations with the same numerator set and denominator, carried by different localisations of
A at s, have isomorphic completions, so one is strongly noetherian exactly when the other is.
Nothing else is assumed: no nilpotence, no noetherianity.
This is the invariance a caller needs in order to change carriers.
A rational localisation of a strongly noetherian Tate ring is strongly noetherian,
whenever the numerators together with the denominator s generate the unit ideal.
Strong noetherianity of A alone suffices: nothing is assumed of the localisation, and the
hypothesis on the numerators is the rational-subset condition, which holds by definition wherever
A⟨T/s⟩ is the ring of a rational subset.
This is the form Wedhorn's §8.2 needs in order to iterate: it makes strong noetherianity stable
under passing to a rational localisation, so the argument may be repeated inside A⟨T/s⟩.