Documentation

TauCeti.RingTheory.Huber.Padic.Basic

The p-adic integers are a Huber ring, and not a Tate ring #

ℤ_[p] with its norm topology is a Huber ring, with (ℤ_[p], (p)) as a pair of definition, and it is not a Tate ring. It is the roadmap's Layer-0 example after the discrete case, and the first to separate TauCeti.Huber.IsHuberRing from TauCeti.Huber.IsTateRing: the topology is adic for the proper ideal (p), so no unit is topologically nilpotent.

Main results #

Implementation notes #

The pair of definition (ℤ_[p], (p)) is the general adic pair TauCeti.Huber.PairOfDefinition.adic of TauCeti/RingTheory/Huber/Adic.lean, applied to the maximal ideal.

Scope #

Only ℤ_[p] is treated here. The roadmap's remaining Layer-0 examples — ℚ_[p] and F⸨t⸩ are Tate, and ℚ_p⟨T₁,…,Tₙ⟩ is complete and strongly noetherian — are not proved in this file.

References #

The n-th power of the maximal ideal of ℤ_[p] is the closed ball of radius p⁻ⁿ: this is what ties the norm topology to the (p)-adic one.

The norm topology of ℤ_[p] is the (p)-adic topology.

The norm topology of ℤ_[p] is linear: the ideals (p ^ n) are a neighbourhood basis of zero.

A p-adic integer is topologically nilpotent exactly when it is divisible by p.

ℤ_[p] is a Huber ring, with (ℤ_[p], (p)) as a pair of definition: the norm topology is the adic topology of the principal ideal (p).

ℤ_[p] is not a Tate ring: it admits no pseudouniformiser. Together with TauCeti.Huber.PadicInt.isHuberRing this separates IsHuberRing from IsTateRing.