Weighted restricted power series A⟨X⟩_T #
For a commutative nonarchimedean ring A and a family T of subsets of A indexed by the
variables, Wedhorn defines the weighted restricted power series ring
A⟨X⟩_T := { ∑ aν Xν ∈ A[[X]] | aν ∈ Tν · U for every open subgroup U of A and almost all ν },
with the subgroups U⟨X⟩ := { ∑ aν Xν ∈ A⟨X⟩_T | aν ∈ Tν · U for all ν } as a fundamental
system of neighbourhoods of zero. Here Tν := T₁^ν₁ ⋯ Tₖ^νₖ. Taking every Tᵢ = {1} recovers
the ordinary restricted series A⟨X⟩.
Both of those claims need Wedhorn's standing hypothesis TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily T,
fixed at the start of his §5.6: without it A⟨X⟩_T is not multiplicatively closed and the
U⟨X⟩ are not neighbourhoods of zero. The subring and topology constructions
(weightedRestrictedSubring, weightedNhd, weightedTopology and the maps into them) therefore
take it as an argument; the underlying weight operations weightPow and weightMul and the
predicate IsWeightedRestricted do not, since they are defined for any family. The
counterexample in IsWeightFamily's docstring shows the hypothesis is not automatic.
Main definitions #
TauCeti.Huber.weightPow: the subsetTν = T₁^ν₁ ⋯ Tₖ^νₖofA.TauCeti.Huber.weightMul: the additive subgroupTν · U.TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily: Wedhorn's standing hypothesis onT— for every variablei, everymand every neighbourhoodUof zero, the subgroupTᵢ^m · Uis again one. The subring and the topology below are defined only under it.TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightedRestricted: Wedhorn's condition (5.6.1) on a power series.TauCeti.Huber.weightedRestrictedSubring:A⟨X⟩_Tas a subring ofA[[X]].TauCeti.Huber.weightedNhd: the subgroupU⟨X⟩ofA⟨X⟩_T.TauCeti.Huber.weightedTopology: the ring topology they generate.A⟨X⟩_Talso carries the group uniformity of that topology, with itsIsUniformAddGroupandUniformContinuousConstSMulinstances, so that its separated completion can be formed.TauCeti.Huber.weightedCandTauCeti.Huber.weightedX: the constant series and the variables.TauCeti.Huber.weightedC_injective, with itssimpformTauCeti.Huber.weightedC_inj, reads a constant series off its coefficient in degree0;TauCeti.Huber.algebraMap_weightedRestrictedSubring_injectiveand its product counterpart state the resulting injectivity for the canonical algebra maps.TauCeti.Huber.weightedMap: the morphismA⟨X⟩_T → B⟨X⟩_Sinduced by a continuous ring map carrying each weight into the corresponding one;continuous_weightedMapmakes it a morphism of topological rings, andweightedMap_idwithweightedMap_compare the functor laws.
Main results #
TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily.of_exists_isOpenMap_mul, withTauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily.of_exists_isUnitandTauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily.of_forall_openAddSubgroup: the three ways to supply the standing hypothesis. The first assumes multiplication by an element ofTᵢis an open map.TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightedRestricted.mul:A⟨X⟩_Tis closed under multiplication, the point Wedhorn flags as not entirely clear; with the additive closure lemmas this gives the subring.TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightedRestricted.finite_coeff_notMemrestates the predicate as finiteness of the exceptional set of coefficients.TauCeti.Huber.weightedNhd_subgroups_basis: theU⟨X⟩are a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of zero for a ring topology, with its contract (hasBasis_nhds_zero_weightedTopology,isTopologicalRing_weightedTopology,nonarchimedeanRing_weightedTopology,continuous_weightedC).TauCeti.Huber.weightedC_mem_weightedNhdrecords that a constant series meets theUbound exactly when its value does, andTauCeti.Huber.isOpen_weightedNhdthatU⟨X⟩is open wheneverUis.TauCeti.Huber.weightedRestrictedSubring_one_weight: for the trivial weight this is the ordinary ring of restricted power series (Wedhorn Example 5.54), withTauCeti.Huber.subringCongr_one_weight_weightedXandTauCeti.Huber.subringCongr_one_weight_weightedCsaying where that identification sends the generators — torestrictedXand to the algebra map.TauCeti.Huber.weightedPolynomials, the polynomials as a subring ofA⟨X⟩_T, withmem_weightedPolynomials_iffidentifying it with finite support and the generatorsweightedC/weightedXin it;TauCeti.Huber.dense_weightedPolynomialsis Wedhorn 5.49(1), read off the predicate-levelexists_mvPolynomial_forall_coeff_sub_mem.TauCeti.Huber.weightedPolynomialEquiv, withdiscreteTopology_weightedRestrictedSubringandweightedPolynomials_eq_top: over a discrete ring the weighted topology is discrete andA⟨X⟩_Tis exactly the polynomial ring.TauCeti.Huber.weightedRestrictedSubring_fin_zeroandTauCeti.Huber.weightedRestrictedSubringFinZeroEquiv, withcontinuous_weightedRestrictedSubringFinZeroEquivand its_symm: in no variables every series is restricted, soA⟨X⟩_TisA— and topologically so, since the indexFin 0 →₀ ℕis a singleton and the basic neighbourhood is cut out by that one coefficient. All of them are stated for an arbitraryT : Fin 0 → Set Aand take no weight-family hypothesis:TauCeti.Huber.isWeightFamily_fin_zerosupplies it, the condition being a statement about each index and there being none.TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightedRestricted.map, withRingHom.weightMul_map_leandimage_weightPow: restrictedness is preserved by a continuous ring map carrying eachT iintoS i. This is whatweightedMapis built from;weightedMap_weightedXsays it fixes the variables, whileweightedMap_weightedCsays it acts asφon constants — the constants are moved, not fixed.weightedMap_idandweightedMap_compare the functor laws.TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily.image: a continuous open ring map carries a weight family to a weight family.
Scope #
Wedhorn states (5.6.1) for an arbitrary index set I. This file formalises the finite-variable
case I = Fin k. The product defining the weight therefore runs over all variables.
Implementation notes #
Tν · U is read as the additive subgroup generated by the products t * u, not as the
pointwise product set. Wedhorn's own statement forces this: he asserts that the U⟨X⟩ are a
fundamental system of neighbourhoods of zero for a ring topology, so each must be an additive
subgroup, and the pointwise set {t * u} is not closed under addition.
The predicate carries no nonarchimedean hypothesis, matching (5.6.1), but it only means
coefficient convergence when the open additive subgroups are a neighbourhood basis of zero — the
setting Wedhorn works in throughout §5.6. Without that it can be vacuous: over ℝ with its usual
topology the only open additive subgroup is ℝ itself, so every power series is T-restricted
for the trivial weight. TauCeti.Huber.isWeightedRestricted_one_weight_iff therefore assumes
NonarchimedeanAddGroup — the additive condition is what rules that vacuity out, and no
multiplicative structure of the topology enters its proof.
If some Tᵢ is empty and νᵢ > 0 then Tν is empty and Tν · U = ⊥, so all but finitely many
such coefficients must vanish; the closure lemmas below need no nonemptiness hypothesis.
This construction is not the same as retopologising the ordinary A⟨X⟩ by transporting along a
substitution X ↦ f X: there the weight multiplies the coefficient rather than the
neighbourhood, and the carrier does not vary with T. Here the carrier itself depends on T.
Nor is it Mathlib's MvPowerSeries.IsRestricted, despite that also being a weighted condition.
Mathlib weights by a polyradius c : σ → ℝ over a normed ring, asking that
‖coeff t f‖ * ∏ i, c i ^ t i tend to 0 along the cofinite filter. A Huber ring's topology is
nonarchimedean but in general carries no norm, so no polyradius is available to state that
condition, and the weight family here is a family of subsets Tᵢ ⊆ A acting on neighbourhood
subgroups rather than a family of reals scaling coefficient norms. The two do agree at the
trivial weight when the norm is ultrametric: the balls {a | ‖a‖ < r} are then additive
subgroups, and every open subgroup contains one, so quantifying over all open subgroups is the
same as quantifying over the balls and the condition becomes ‖coeff ν f‖ → 0 along the
cofinite filter. Over a general normed ring they do not agree: over ℝ, as above, the condition
here is vacuous while Mathlib's still asks for ‖coeff ν f‖ → 0. The unweighted predicate of
TauCeti/RingTheory/Huber/Restricted/PowerSeries.lean is a topological limit rather than a
condition on subgroups, and that file remarks on the comparison for it — in prose, not as a
proved declaration. Neither notion is a special case of the other in general.
The finite-family absorption fact the multiplicative arguments run on — finitely many fixed
elements are absorbed into their own targets by a single open subgroup — mentions no weight, so
it lives in TauCeti/Topology/Algebra/Nonarchimedean/Absorption.lean, built on Mathlib's
single-element NonarchimedeanRing.left_mul_subset.
Closure of A⟨X⟩_T under multiplication is the one non-obvious point of the construction —
Wedhorn writes "note that it is not entirely clear that A⟨X⟩_T is multiplicatively closed" — and
is TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightedRestricted.mul here. It is exactly what the standing hypothesis is
for.
Provenance #
The construction differs from AINTLIB's TateAlgebraWedhorn, which retopologises the ordinary
A⟨X⟩ by transporting along a substitution rather than letting the carrier depend on T.
The proofs, however, follow TauCeti/RingTheory/Huber/Restricted/PowerSeries.lean
(TauCetiProject/TauCeti#2348), which is itself AINTLIB-derived — and not only in API layout. In
particular TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightedRestricted.mul follows the plan of IsRestricted.mul there:
choose W with W · W ⊆ U; take the finite sets of coefficients of f and g that fail the W
bound; find one open subgroup absorbing those finitely many bad coefficients into the target;
rule out the exceptional index set (F + G_Z) ∪ (F_Z + G); and split each antidiagonal term by
whether neither, or exactly one, of its factors is bad.
What is new there is the weighting, and it is not cosmetic: the target Tν · U varies with the
index, so the absorbing subgroup has to work against a family of targets — which is what
TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily is for and what
NonarchimedeanRing.exists_openAddSubgroup_forall_mul_subset was factored out to supply — and
the trichotomy has to land in Tα · U and Tβ · U separately before mul_mem_weightMul_add
recombines them at α + β. The unweighted proof needs none of that.
The API layout — the isWeightedRestricted_zero/one/add/neg/mul series, the subring with its
mem_ lemma, and the algebra-map coercion — follows the same file.
References #
- T. Wedhorn, Adic Spaces, Remark and Definition 5.48, equation (5.6.1),
Proposition 5.49(1) for the density of the polynomials, and Example 5.54 for the case
Tᵢ = {1}.
Weights and weighted subgroups #
The weight Tν = T₁^ν₁ ⋯ Tₖ^νₖ attached to a multi-index, as a subset of A.
Equations
- TauCeti.Huber.weightPow T ν = ∏ i : Fin k, T i ^ ν i
Instances For
Unfolding lemma for TauCeti.Huber.weightPow.
At the zero multi-index every factor is T i ^ 0 = 1, so the weight is the trivial
set 1 = {1}.
At a single-variable multi-index the weight is the corresponding power: T^(single i m) is
Tᵢ ^ m.
A monoid homomorphism carries the weight Tν onto the weight of the image family.
The additive subgroup generated by the products t * u with t ∈ Tν and u ∈ U.
See the module docstring: the subgroup, not the pointwise product set, is what Wedhorn's statement
requires.
Equations
- TauCeti.Huber.weightMul T ν U = AddSubgroup.closure (TauCeti.Huber.weightPow T ν * ↑U)
Instances For
Elimination through a multiplication. To land the whole of a * (Tν · U) inside a
subgroup V it is enough to land the generators a * (t * u). This is
TauCeti.Huber.weightMul_le read in V.comap (AddMonoidHom.mulLeft a).
At the zero multi-index the weight is trivial, so T⁰ · U is just U; in particular it is a
neighbourhood of zero whenever U is.
The unexceptional term of a convolution. If W · W ⊆ U, then a product of an element of
Tα · W with an element of Tβ · W lies in Tν · U whenever α + β = ν.
Multiplying by a weight element shifts the multi-index: T^β · (T^α · U) ⊆ T^(α+β) · U.
Splitting a multi-index splits the weight subgroup: T^(α+β) · U is generated by T^α
against T^β · U.
The absorption step. If multiplication by a carries the subgroup Z into T^α · U,
then it carries all of T^β · Z into T^(α+β) · U.
If every coefficient of f meets the V bound and every coefficient of g meets the W
bound, then every coefficient of f * g meets the V · W bound. Unlike
TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightedRestricted.mul there are no exceptional coefficients.
Wedhorn's standing hypothesis on the weight family, fixed at the start of his §5.6: for every
variable i, every m, and every neighbourhood U of zero, the subgroup Tᵢ^m · U is again a
neighbourhood of zero.
Without it A⟨X⟩_T is not multiplicatively closed. Take A = ℚ_p⟨Y, Z⟩, T = {Y}, f = Z X
and g = ∑ₙ Yⁿ pⁿ Xⁿ: both are T-restricted, but the Xᵏ coefficient of f * g is
Z Yᵏ⁻¹ pᵏ⁻¹, which never lies in Tᵏ · A = Yᵏ A. Note that there A is complete, Tate and
Huber and T is finite, bounded and power-bounded — so none of those conditions substitute for
this one. What fails is exactly that Y A is not open.
Equations
- TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily T = ∀ (i : Fin k) (m : ℕ), ∀ U ∈ nhds 0, ↑(AddSubgroup.closure (T i ^ m * U)) ∈ nhds 0
Instances For
Unfolding lemma for TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily.
The openness form of the standing hypothesis. If some element of each T i multiplies
open sets to open sets, the family is a weight family.
Openness of the subgroup generated by Tᵢ · A alone does not supply the neighbourhood condition
for arbitrarily small U. An open multiplication map supplies it directly, as does a unit acting
continuously in TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily.of_exists_isUnit.
Wedhorn's automatic case: the standing hypothesis holds as soon as each weight contains a unit.
One unit per index suffices; no conditions are imposed on the other elements of T i.
Only multiplication by units needs to be continuous: each such multiplication is then a homeomorphism, with inverse multiplication by the inverse unit.
Wedhorn: the standing hypothesis is automatic when every Tᵢ is {1}, the important special
case, since then Tᵢ^m · U is the subgroup generated by U.
Wedhorn (5.6.1): a power series is T-restricted if, for every open subgroup U of A,
all but finitely many of its coefficients lie in Tν · U.
Equations
- TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightedRestricted T f = ∀ (U : OpenAddSubgroup A), ∀ᶠ (ν : Fin k →₀ ℕ) in Filter.cofinite, (MvPowerSeries.coeff ν) f ∈ TauCeti.Huber.weightMul T ν ↑U
Instances For
Unfolding lemma for TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightedRestricted.
The zero series is T-restricted.
The one series is T-restricted: every coefficient but the constant one vanishes.
Wedhorn's derived hypothesis: from the per-variable assumption that each Tᵢ^m · U is a
neighbourhood of zero it follows that Tν · U is one for every multi-index ν. Wedhorn states
this in a sentence: "Then Tν U is a neighborhood of 0 for all ν".
Over a nonarchimedean ring the standing hypothesis need only be checked on open subgroups:
those are cofinal in the neighbourhoods of zero, and Tᵢ^m · V ≤ Tᵢ^m · U for V ⊆ U.
The subgroups Tν · U are themselves open, so they can be fed back into
TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightedRestricted, which quantifies over OpenAddSubgroup A.
Each Tᵢ^m · A is an open additive subgroup of A: the U = ⊤ case of
TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily.isOpen_weightMul.
Wedhorn Example 5.54: for the trivial weight Tᵢ = {1} the condition is the ordinary
restrictedness of A⟨X⟩, that the coefficients tend to zero along the cofinite filter. This is
the nontrivial witness that TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightedRestricted is not vacuous.
Anything with only finitely many nonzero coefficients is T-restricted, whatever the weight:
the zero coefficients meet every bound. This is the source of all the polynomial constructors
below.
A monomial is T-restricted.
A constant series is T-restricted.
Each variable is T-restricted.
A sum of T-restricted series is T-restricted.
Weighted restrictedness, restated: for every open additive subgroup U, only finitely many
coefficients fail to lie in Tν · U.
A⟨X⟩_T is closed under multiplication (Wedhorn 5.48, the point he flags as "not
entirely clear").
This is the substantive use of the standing hypothesis TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily — the
neighbourhood half, TauCeti.Huber.exists_weightedNhd_mul_mem, uses it too — and the docstring
of that definition records what goes wrong without it.
The negation of a T-restricted series is T-restricted.
The ring A⟨X⟩_T #
Wedhorn's A⟨X⟩_T: the weighted restricted power series form a subring of A[[X]].
The weight family must satisfy Wedhorn's standing hypothesis
(TauCeti.Huber.IsWeightFamily); without it the carrier is not closed under multiplication, and
the docstring of that definition records the counterexample.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Membership in A⟨X⟩_T is T-restrictedness.
The constant-series embedding A → A⟨X⟩_T.
Equations
Instances For
The constant-series embedding is injective: a constant series is read off as its
coefficient in degree 0.
Equality of constant series is equality of constants: the iff form of
TauCeti.Huber.weightedC_injective.
The variable Xᵢ, as an element of A⟨X⟩_T.
Equations
- TauCeti.Huber.weightedX T hT i = ⟨MvPowerSeries.X i, ⋯⟩
Instances For
A⟨X⟩_T is an A-algebra, via the constant series.
Equations
The structure map of the A-algebra A⟨X⟩_T is the constant-series embedding.
The structure map into a weighted restricted-series ring is injective, since it is the constant-series embedding.
The diagonal structure map into a product of weighted restricted-series rings is injective.
Wedhorn's neighbourhood subgroups U⟨X⟩: the series all of whose coefficients — not
merely almost all — satisfy the U bound. These are the fundamental system of neighbourhoods of
zero for the topology on A⟨X⟩_T.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Membership in U⟨X⟩ is the U bound on every coefficient.
The zero subgroup bounds exactly the zero series.
Wedhorn Example 5.54, bundled: for the trivial weight, A⟨X⟩_T is the ordinary ring of
restricted power series, not merely a predicate-level equivalent.
The weighted variable is the restricted variable. Transporting weightedX along the
identification above gives restrictedX.
weightedRestrictedSubring_one_weight is an equality of subrings, so it transports elements along
RingEquiv.subringCongr; what it does not say is where the generators go. This and the companion
below say it, so that a generator-level statement proved over one of the two subrings can be read
over the other instead of being re-transported at each use site.
The weighted constant is the algebra map. Transporting weightedC a along the same
identification gives the image of a under the structure map of the restricted subring.
The neighbourhood subgroups are monotone in U.
The multiplicative half of the neighbourhood basis: if W · W ⊆ U then the product of two
elements of W⟨X⟩ lies in U⟨X⟩. This is the condition
RingSubgroupsBasis calls mul, and unlike multiplicative closure of the ring it needs no
finiteness argument.
A constant series lies in U⟨X⟩ exactly when its value lies in U: the constant coefficient is
unweighted, since T⁰ · U is U, and every other coefficient vanishes.
The left-multiplication half of the neighbourhood basis: for a fixed x ∈ A⟨X⟩_T and an
open subgroup U, some V⟨X⟩ is carried into U⟨X⟩ by multiplication by x. This is the
condition RingSubgroupsBasis calls leftMul.
Unlike TauCeti.Huber.mul_mem_weightedNhd this does need the bad coefficients of x handled,
since x is only restricted rather than uniformly bounded — but no exceptional set of ν
survives, because the absorbing subgroup works for every β at once.
The neighbourhood basis of A⟨X⟩_T: the subgroups U⟨X⟩, as U ranges over the open
subgroups of A, are a RingSubgroupsBasis. This is Wedhorn's assertion that they form a
fundamental system of neighbourhoods of zero for a ring topology.
Wedhorn's topology on A⟨X⟩_T (Remark and Definition 5.48): the ring topology whose
neighbourhoods of zero are the U⟨X⟩.
Consumers should go through the contract lemmas below rather than unfolding this: the basis is
hasBasis_nhds_zero_weightedTopology, and isTopologicalRing_weightedTopology /
nonarchimedeanRing_weightedTopology give the structure.
It is an instance rather than a plain def so that a consumer of A⟨X⟩_T gets the topology,
and the IsTopologicalRing and NonarchimedeanRing structures below, by inference. Both T and
the standing hypothesis are implicit because they are read off the carrier's own type.
On diamonds. Mathlib does register a topology on MvPowerSeries σ R, but as a scoped
instance in MvPowerSeries.WithPiTopology (Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/PiTopology.lean).
It is therefore invisible here, and no file in this repository opens that scope; a downstream file
that did would get the induced subtype topology on the carrier alongside this instance, and would
have to say which it means.
Equations
The U⟨X⟩ are a basis of neighbourhoods of zero for weightedTopology.
A⟨X⟩_T is a topological ring.
A⟨X⟩_T is nonarchimedean: it inherits a basis of open additive subgroups at zero, as every
ring built from a RingSubgroupsBasis does.
U⟨X⟩ is open in A⟨X⟩_T when U is open in A: it is one of the basic neighbourhoods of
zero, and an additive subgroup that is a neighbourhood of zero is open.
The constant-series embedding A → A⟨X⟩_T is continuous.
A constant series has its only nonzero coefficient at ν = 0, where T⁰ · U is U itself, so
the open subgroup U already witnesses continuity at zero.
Density of the polynomials #
Every polynomial is T-restricted, for any family T.
Wedhorn 5.49(1), the approximation step, at predicate level: a T-restricted series is
approximated by a polynomial, coefficientwise inside Tν · U. Neither a nonarchimedean
hypothesis on A nor IsWeightFamily T is needed — only the ambient [CommRing A] and
[TopologicalSpace A] that OpenAddSubgroup A already asks for.
The coefficientwise inclusion of the polynomials into A⟨X⟩_T, as a ring homomorphism.
Every polynomial is T-restricted, so it lands in A⟨X⟩_T and not merely in A[[X]]; its range
is TauCeti.Huber.weightedPolynomials.
Equations
Instances For
The inclusion sends the polynomial constant C a to the constant series weightedC a.
The inclusion sends the polynomial variable X i to the weighted variable weightedX i.
The inclusion of the polynomials is injective: a polynomial is determined by its coefficients, and the inclusion changes none of them.
This is what makes TauCeti.Huber.weightedPolynomials a faithful copy of MvPolynomial (Fin k) A
inside A⟨X⟩_T, so that a map defined on polynomials transfers to it.
A[X] ⊆ A⟨X⟩_T, as a subring.
Equations
Instances For
A[X] and its copy inside A⟨X⟩_T are the same ring. The inclusion is injective by
TauCeti.Huber.weightedPolynomialHom_injective and surjective onto its range by construction.
This is what lets a homomorphism defined on MvPolynomial (Fin k) A — an evaluation, say — be
read as one defined on the subring of A⟨X⟩_T, which is where the uniformity lives.
Equations
Instances For
Membership in weightedPolynomials is exactly having finitely many nonzero coefficients.
A constant series is a polynomial.
A weighted variable is a polynomial.
Wedhorn 5.49(1): the polynomials are dense in A⟨X⟩_T.
Agreement on the generators propagates to the polynomials. Two ring homomorphisms out of
A⟨X⟩_T that agree on every constant series and every variable agree on the whole polynomial
subring. No topology is involved.
A continuous homomorphism out of A⟨X⟩_T is determined by its values on the generators.
Two of them agreeing on every constant series and every variable are equal. This is the
uniqueness half of Wedhorn 5.50: among continuous homomorphisms there is at most one extending a
given map on constants and sending each Xᵢ to a prescribed value.
Equality on the polynomial subring is propagated to the whole ring by its density, and that is what continuity and the Hausdorff hypothesis are for. Whether uniqueness can fail without them is not addressed here.
The discrete case #
Over a discrete ring the picture collapses: {0} is an open subgroup, so a restricted series
has finitely many nonzero coefficients — A⟨X⟩_T is the polynomial ring — and the topology
generated by U⟨X⟩ at U = ⊥ is discrete.
Over a discrete ring every weighted topology is discrete: ⊥⟨X⟩ = {0} is open.
Over a discrete ring the restricted series are exactly the polynomials.
Over a discrete ring, the coefficientwise inclusion of the polynomials into A⟨X⟩_T is a
ring isomorphism.
Equations
Instances For
The forward map of weightedPolynomialEquiv is the coefficientwise inclusion
weightedPolynomialHom, so its coe_/_C/_X lemmas apply.
Zero variables #
At k = 0 the coefficient index Fin 0 →₀ ℕ is a singleton: a series is its constant coefficient
and nothing else. So restrictedness is vacuous, and the basic neighbourhood cut out by a subgroup
U is exactly the series whose one coefficient lies in U, which is U.
Neither fact mentions the weight, so the whole section is stated for an arbitrary
T : Fin 0 → Set A — at Fin 0 the only multi-index is 0, and weightMul T 0 U is U for
every T. The weight-family hypothesis is not carried either: it quantifies over the index, so
isWeightFamily_fin_zero discharges it outright.
Every family of sets indexed by no variables is a weight family, the condition being a statement about each index and there being none. This is what lets the rest of this section drop the hypothesis.
At zero variables every power series is restricted, whatever the weight. There is only one monomial, so every series has finite support.
A⟨⟩ = A: the restricted power series in no variables are A itself, as a ring.
Equations
Instances For
The zero-variable comparison is the constant coefficient.
The zero-variable comparison is continuous.
The inverse comparison sends a to the constant series.
The inverse of the zero-variable comparison is continuous: it is the constant-series map
weightedC, whose continuity is already known.
The uniform structure #
A⟨X⟩_T carries the group uniformity of its additive topological group, so that its separated
completion can be formed. As with weightedTopology there is no diamond to fear: Mathlib's
uniformity on MvPowerSeries (like its topology) lives in the scoped
MvPowerSeries.WithPiTopology, so nothing else registers a UniformSpace on this carrier.
Functoriality #
weightMul is functorial: a ring map carrying each T i into S i and U into V
carries Tν · U into Sν · V.
A weight family pushes forward along a continuous open ring map: if φ : A → B is
continuous and open, the images φ '' T i of a weight family form a weight family on B.
For a ring isomorphism continuous in both directions, IsOpenMap.of_inverse supplies the
openness, so weight families transport along isomorphisms of topological rings.
Restrictedness is functorial: a continuous ring map carrying each T i into S i
carries T-restricted series to S-restricted ones.
The induced morphism A⟨X⟩_T → B⟨X⟩_S: a continuous ring map φ : A → B carrying each
weight T i into S i induces one, acting coefficientwise.
The two weight families are given independently rather than taking S i := φ '' T i, because
the image of a weight family need not be one.
Equations
- TauCeti.Huber.weightedMap hφ hT hS hTS = ((MvPowerSeries.map φ).comp (TauCeti.Huber.weightedRestrictedSubring T hT).subtype).codRestrict (TauCeti.Huber.weightedRestrictedSubring S hS) ⋯
Instances For
weightedMap is MvPowerSeries.map with its codomain cut down, so its values coerce back to
the coefficientwise map.
weightedMap is compatible with the constant-series embeddings.
weightedMap is continuous, so the induced morphism is one of topological rings rather
than of the underlying rings only.
The identity law: the map induced by RingHom.id is the identity.
The composition law: the map induced by a composite is the composite of the induced maps.
With weightedMap_id this is what makes A⟨X⟩_T functorial in the pair (A, T).
weightedMap fixes the variables.