A Tate ring has a zero sequence of units #
Henkel's open mapping theorem is stated for a topological ring carrying a zero sequence of
units. That hypothesis and the absorption property it exists for are generic, and live in
TauCeti/Topology/Algebra/ZeroSequenceOfUnits.lean; this file supplies the bridge from Huber
theory, namely that the powers of a pseudouniformiser are such a sequence.
This is where the Tate condition enters Henkel's theorem: a Huber ring that is not Tate need not
admit such a sequence, ℤ_[p] being the example.
Main results #
TauCeti.Huber.IsPseudoUniformizer.tendsto_pow_unit: the powers of a pseudouniformiser converge to zero, as units. This is the concrete sequence, kept nameable so a caller holdingϖcan feed it to the generic results instead of destructing an existential.TauCeti.Huber.IsPseudoUniformizer.hasZeroSequenceOfUnitsandTauCeti.Huber.IsTateRing.hasZeroSequenceOfUnits: a pseudouniformiser — hence a Tate ring, by instance search — satisfies the hypothesis.
References #
- L. Henkel, An Open Mapping Theorem for rings which have a zero sequence of units, arXiv:1407.5647, whose hypothesis this discharges.
- Wedhorn, Adic Spaces, Theorem 6.16 and Propositions 6.17–6.18, which are proved from Henkel's theorem; downstream context for this file rather than its source.
The powers of a pseudouniformiser converge to zero, as units. This is the concrete zero
sequence, kept nameable so a caller holding ϖ can feed it to the absorption and covering
results instead of destructing an existential.
A pseudouniformiser makes the ring admit a zero sequence of units. No Huber or Tate
hypothesis is needed: a topologically nilpotent unit supplies the class, through its powers.
It is sufficient, not equivalent — the class asks only for some sequence of units tending to
zero, and such a sequence need not consist of the powers of a single unit. The witness here is
TauCeti.Huber.IsPseudoUniformizer.tendsto_pow_unit, which a caller wanting the powers
themselves should use instead.
A Tate ring satisfies Henkel's hypothesis on the base ring, via the powers of a pseudouniformiser.
This is where the Tate condition enters Henkel's theorem: a Huber ring that is not Tate need not
admit such a sequence, ℤ_[p] being the example.