The kernel of an exponent sum of a free pro-p group and its graded pieces #
Let F = freeProP p X be the free pro-p group on a finite type X with generators x_i, and
fix i ∈ X. The kernel of the i-th exponent sum X_i := ker (F → ℤ_p, y ↦ (exponentSum y)_i)
(TauCeti.freeProP.exponentSumKer) is the closed normal subgroup of F topologically generated,
as a normal subgroup, by the generators x_j with j ≠ i; it contains the closed commutator
subgroup. When a continuous character χ : F → ℤ_pˣ is trivial on the x_j with j ≠ i and takes
x_i to an element of infinite order, its kernel is exactly X_i: this is the kernel X = ker χ
of the orientation of a Demushkin group in Labute's normal form, on whose graded Lie algebra his
classification of the dyadic even-rank Demushkin groups runs (Labute, §4).
The graded pieces gr_m(X_i) ≤ gr_m(F) of X_i along the lower p-series
(TauCeti.gradedPieceOf) are computed by three statements, which are Labute's Lemmas 1–3 in our
0-based indexing:
Complement (Lemma 1). The class of
y ∈ λ_m(F)lies ingr_m(X_i)exactly whenp ^ (m + 1)divides thei-th exponent sum ofy, andgr_m(F) = gr_m(X_i) ⊕ 𝔽_p π^m ξ_i, whereξ_iis the class ofx_iandπthep-power operator (TauCeti.freeProP.isCompl_gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_span_gradedPowIter).Generation (Lemma 2). For
m ≥ 1,gr_{m+1}(X_i)is generated by thep-powersπ τand the brackets[τ, ξ_j]withτ ∈ gr_m(X_i), stated as a criterion for a subspace to containgr_{m+1}(X_i)(TauCeti.freeProP.gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_succ_le). The proof decomposes a class ofgr_m(F)along the complement of Lemma 1; the only bracket not covered by the hypotheses is[π^m ξ_i, y], which isπ [π^{m-1} ξ_i, y]form ≥ 2andπ [ξ_i, y] - (p choose 2) • [[ξ_i, y], ξ_i]form = 1.The constrained span statement (Lemma 3). Let
ρ ∈ gr_1(F)be the class of a relator whose partial derivatives∂_k ρspangr_0(F), whosep-power part sits on a single generatorx_{i₀}, and whose derivatives at the generators other thanx_{i₀}span every generator classξ_jwithj ≠ i₁. Then for everym ≥ 1gr_{m+1}(X_{i₁}) = δ_ρ(gr_m(X_{i₁})^X) + T_{m+1},where
δ_ρis the basis-modification map ofTauCeti.freeProP.basisModificationDeltaand the tailT_{m+1}is spanned by theπ^{m+1} ξ_awitha ≠ i₁(gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_eq_map_basisModificationDelta_sup_span_gradedPowIterinTauCeti.freeProP). This refines the unconstrained span statements ofFree/BasisModification.lean: the basis correctionsω ∈ gr_m(F)^Xrealizing a discrepancy ingr_{m+1}(X_{i₁})may be chosen ingr_m(X_{i₁})^X, that is, inside the kernel of the orientation, which is what keeps the orientation fixed along a successive approximation. The statement holds for every primep; the relatorsx₁^q (x₁, x₂)(x₃, x₄) ⋯ (x_{n-1}, x_n)withp ∣ qsatisfy its hypotheses withi₀ = x₁andi₁ = x₂.The exceptional generator (Lemma 3 of Labute's §4.2). When one further generator class
ξ_{i₂}can only be reached through the derivative∂_{i₀} ρat thep-power generator, the same argument givesgr_{m+1}(X_{i₁}) = δ_ρ(gr_m(X_{i₁})^X) + T_{m+1} + 𝔽_p π^m [ξ_{i₂}, ξ_{i₁}](
gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_eq_map_basisModificationDelta_sup_gradedPowIterBracket), and when the coefficient of∂_{i₀} ρinξ_{i₂}is nonzero the tailπ^{m+1} ξ_{i₂}lies in the image ofδ_ρ, so the tail may be taken over thea ≠ i₁, i₂(gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_eq_map_basisModificationDelta_sup_gradedPowIterBracket_of_ne). The extra vectorπ^m [ξ_{i₂}, ξ_{i₁}]is genuinely needed atp = 2: the relatorx₁² (x₁, x₂) x₃^{2^f} (x₃, x₄) ⋯hasi₀ = x₁,i₁ = x₄andi₂ = x₂.
Main definitions #
TauCeti.freeProP.exponentSumKer: the kernelX_iof thei-th exponent sum.
Main results #
TauCeti.freeProP.exponentSumKer_eq_topologicalClosure_normalClosure:X_iis the closed normal closure of the generatorsx_j,j ≠ i; hence a continuous homomorphism trivial on those generators is trivial onX_i(ContinuousMonoidHom.exponentSumKer_le_ker), and a dyadic character whose values at those generators square to1is trivial onX_i ∩ λ_1(F)(ContinuousMonoidHom.apply_eq_one_of_mem_exponentSumKer_of_mem_pLowerCentralSeries_one).ContinuousMonoidHom.exponentSumKer_eq_ker:X_iis the kernel of every continuous character trivial on the generatorsx_j,j ≠ i, and of infinite order atx_i.ContinuousMonoidHom.apply_mem_exponentSumKer_iff_of_forall_inv_mul_apply_mem: a continuous endomorphism moving each generator insideX_ipreservesX_i.TauCeti.freeProP.gradedMk_mem_gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_iff: the class ofy ∈ λ_m(F)lies ingr_m(X_i)exactly whenp ^ (m + 1)divides itsi-th exponent sum.TauCeti.freeProP.isCompl_gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_span_gradedPowIter:gr_m(F) = gr_m(X_i) ⊕ 𝔽_p π^m ξ_i.TauCeti.freeProP.gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_le_of_le_sup_span_gradedPowIter: a subspace ofgr_m(X_i)which together withπ^m ξ_ispansgr_m(X_i)isgr_m(X_i).TauCeti.freeProP.gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_succ_le: the generation criterion forgr_{m+1}(X_i).gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_eq_map_basisModificationDelta_sup_span_gradedPowIter,gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_eq_map_basisModificationDelta_sup_gradedPowIterBracketandgradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_eq_map_basisModificationDelta_sup_gradedPowIterBracket_of_ne(inTauCeti.freeProP): the constrained span statement, without and with an exceptional generator.
References #
- J. P. Labute, Classification of Demushkin groups, Canad. J. Math. 19 (1967), 106–132, §4, Lemmas 1–3.
The kernel of an exponent sum #
The kernel of the i-th exponent sum of the free pro-p group on X: the closed normal
subgroup of the elements whose exponent sum at the generator x_i vanishes
(TauCeti.freeProP.mem_exponentSumKer_iff). It contains the closed commutator subgroup and the
generators x_j for j ≠ i, and it is their closed normal closure
(TauCeti.freeProP.exponentSumKer_eq_topologicalClosure_normalClosure).
Equations
- TauCeti.freeProP.exponentSumKer p X i = ((AddMonoidHom.toMultiplicative (Pi.evalAddMonoidHom (fun (x : X) => ℤ_[p]) i)).comp (TauCeti.freeProP.exponentSum p X).toMonoidHom).ker
Instances For
The generator x_j lies in the kernel of the i-th exponent sum exactly when j ≠ i. Not a
simp lemma: simp rewrites the left-hand side with TauCeti.freeProP.mem_exponentSumKer_iff
first (and, given DecidableEq X, evaluates the resulting exponent sum itself).
The generator x_i together with the other generators x_j, j ≠ i, topologically generates
F: this is the generating family of TauCeti.freeProP.topologicalClosure_closure_range_of_eq_top
split at i.
The kernel of the i-th exponent sum is the closed normal closure of the other
generators.
A continuous homomorphism trivial on the generators x_j, j ≠ i, is trivial on the kernel
of the i-th exponent sum, for a T1 target: its kernel is a closed normal subgroup containing
those generators, and X is their closed normal closure.
Endomorphisms preserving the kernel of an exponent sum #
An endomorphism moving each generator inside X preserves the i-th exponent sum, for
X the kernel of that exponent sum: the exponent vector is linear,
exponentSum (φ y) = ∑ x, (exponentSum y)_x • exponentSum (φ x_x)
(TauCeti.freeProP.toAdd_exponentSum_apply_eq_sum_smul), and the i-th coordinate of each
column exponentSum (φ x_x) is δ_{xi}, so the i-th coordinate of exponentSum (φ y) is
(exponentSum y)_i.
An endomorphism moving each generator inside X preserves X, for X the kernel of an
exponent sum.
The kernel of a character trivial on all generators but one is the kernel of the exponent
sum at that generator, when the value at that generator has infinite order: both are the closed
normal closure of the other generators
(TauCeti.freeProP.exponentSumKer_eq_topologicalClosure_normalClosure and
TauCeti.IsProP.ker_eq_topologicalClosure_normalClosure_of_not_isOfFinOrder).
A dyadic character whose values at the generators x_j, j ≠ i, square to 1 is trivial
on X_i ∩ λ_1(F): on X_i its values square to 1, since X_i is the closed normal closure of
those generators, and on λ_1(F) they lie in 1 + 4ℤ_2, which contains no element of order two.
This is how the kernel of the orientation χ(x₂) = -1, χ(x₄) = (1 - 2^f)⁻¹, χ(x_i) = 1
otherwise, of the dyadic even-rank normal form x₁² (x₁, x₂) x₃^{2^f} (x₃, x₄) ⋯ meets the lower
2-series: ker χ ∩ λ_1(F) = X_{x₄} ∩ λ_1(F).
The graded pieces of the kernel of an exponent sum #
The graded pieces of the kernel of an exponent sum: the class in gr_m(F) of y ∈ λ_m(F)
lies in gr_m(X), for X the kernel of the i-th exponent sum, exactly when p ^ (m + 1) divides
the i-th exponent sum of y; the exponent sums of an element of λ_m(F) are always divisible by
p ^ m.
The p-power π^m ξ_i of the class of the generator x_i does not lie in gr_m(X), for
X the kernel of the i-th exponent sum: its i-th exponent sum is p ^ m.
gr_m(F) is spanned by gr_m(X) and π^m ξ_i, for X the kernel of the i-th exponent
sum: the class of y ∈ λ_m(F) with i-th exponent sum p ^ m * a differs from ā • π^m ξ_i,
where ā ∈ 𝔽_p is the residue of a, by a class in gr_m(X).
gr_m(F) = gr_m(X) ⊕ 𝔽_p π^m ξ_i, for X the kernel of the i-th exponent sum
(Labute, §4, Lemma 1).
Every class in gr_m(F) is a class in gr_m(X) plus a multiple of π^m ξ_i.
A subspace of gr_m(X) which together with π^m ξ_i spans gr_m(X) is all of gr_m(X).
The tail T_j spanned by the π^j ξ_a with a ≠ i lies in gr_j(X), for X the kernel of
the i-th exponent sum.
Generation of the graded pieces of the kernel #
Generation of gr_{m+1}(X) from gr_m(X) (Labute, §4, Lemma 2): for m ≥ 1, a subspace
of gr_{m+1}(F) containing the p-powers π τ and the brackets [τ, ξ_j] with the generator
classes, for every τ ∈ gr_m(X), contains gr_{m+1}(X); here X is the kernel of the i-th
exponent sum. The proof writes a class of gr_m(F) as h + c • π^m ξ_i with h ∈ gr_m(X), so that
π and the brackets carry gr_m(F) into the subspace enlarged by 𝔽_p π^{m+1} ξ_i, which is then
all of gr_{m+1}(F), and the component along π^{m+1} ξ_i of a class of gr_{m+1}(X) vanishes.
The constrained span statement #
The image of δ_ρ on families of classes of gr_m(X) lies in gr_{m+1}(X), for X the kernel
of the i₁-th exponent sum.
The constrained span statement with an exceptional generator (Labute, §4, Lemma 3 in both
its forms). Let F be the free pro-p group on a finite linearly ordered type X, let
ρ ∈ gr_1(F) have partial derivatives spanning gr_0(F), let x_{i₀} be the only generator
whose coefficient of π ξ_i in ρ may be nonzero, and let every generator class ξ_j with
j ≠ i₁, i₂ be a combination of the derivatives ∂_k ρ with k ≠ i₀. Let X = ker be the
kernel of the i₁-th exponent sum. Then for every m ≥ 1
gr_{m+1}(X) = δ_ρ(gr_m(X)^X) + T_{m+1} + 𝔽_p π^m [ξ_{i₂}, ξ_{i₁}],
where the tail T_{m+1} is spanned by the p-powers π^{m+1} ξ_a with a ≠ i₁. The exceptional
generator x_{i₂}, whose class needs the derivative ∂_{i₀} ρ, contributes the extra spanning
vector π^m [ξ_{i₂}, ξ_{i₁}], which for p = 2 need not lie in the other two terms; with
i₂ = i₁ it vanishes and the statement is
gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_eq_map_basisModificationDelta_sup_span_gradedPowIter. The two
even-rank dyadic Demushkin relators x₁^{2+2^f} (x₁, x₂)(x₃, x₄) ⋯ and
x₁² (x₁, x₂) x₃^{2^f} (x₃, x₄) ⋯ have i₀ = x₁, and respectively i₂ = i₁ = x₂ and
i₁ = x₄, i₂ = x₂.
The constrained span statement (Labute, §4, Lemma 3). Let F be the free pro-p group on
a finite linearly ordered type X, let ρ ∈ gr_1(F) have partial derivatives spanning gr_0(F),
let x_{i₀} be the only generator whose coefficient of π ξ_i in ρ may be nonzero, and let every
generator class ξ_j with j ≠ i₁ be a combination of the derivatives ∂_k ρ with k ≠ i₀. Let
X = ker be the kernel of the i₁-th exponent sum. Then for every m ≥ 1
gr_{m+1}(X) = δ_ρ(gr_m(X)^X) + T_{m+1},
where the tail T_{m+1} is spanned by the p-powers π^{m+1} ξ_a with a ≠ i₁. This is the
form of the span statement in which the basis corrections are constrained to lie in the kernel of
the orientation, as the uniqueness half of the dyadic even-rank classification requires; for the
relator x₁^q (x₁, x₂)(x₃, x₄) ⋯ the generators are i₀ = x₁ and i₁ = x₂.
The p-power tail at the exceptional generator lies in the image of δ_ρ: if ξ_{i₂} is
a combination Σ_k b_k ∂_k ρ of the derivatives in which the coefficient b_{i₀} c_{i₀} of the
p-power term π is nonzero, then π^{m+1} ξ_{i₂} ∈ δ_ρ(gr_m(X)^X) for m ≥ 1 and i₂ ≠ i₁,
since δ_ρ(b • π^m ξ_{i₂}) = (b_{i₀} c_{i₀}) • π^{m+1} ξ_{i₂} + [π^m ξ_{i₂}, ξ_{i₂}] and the
bracket vanishes.
The constrained span statement with an exceptional generator, sharp form (Labute, §4.2,
Lemma 3). Under the hypotheses of
gradedPieceOf_exponentSumKer_eq_map_basisModificationDelta_sup_gradedPowIterBracket, if moreover
ξ_{i₂} is a combination of the derivatives with nonzero coefficient b_{i₀} c_{i₀} at the
p-power generator and i₂ ≠ i₁, then the tail at x_{i₂} is absorbed by the image of δ_ρ:
gr_{m+1}(X) = δ_ρ(gr_m(X)^X) + T'_{m+1} + 𝔽_p π^m [ξ_{i₂}, ξ_{i₁}],
with T'_{m+1} spanned by the π^{m+1} ξ_a for a ≠ i₁, i₂. For the relator
x₁² (x₁, x₂) x₃^{2^f} (x₃, x₄) ⋯ these are Labute's spanning vectors π^{m+1} ξ_a (a ≠ x₂, x₄)
and π^m [ξ₂, ξ₄].