Proper ideals of a complete Huber pair are contained in supports #
Over a complete Hausdorff Huber pair (A, A⁺) every proper ideal J of A is contained in the
support of some point of Spa (A, A⁺):
J ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ v ∈ Spa (A, A⁺), J ⊆ supp v.
This is Wedhorn's Proposition 7.51 in the form his §8 uses; for a maximal ideal the containment is
an equality. Its standard consequence proved here is the unit criterion of Proposition 7.52(2).
Corollary 7.53, which characterizes when a finite set's standard rational family covers the
spectrum, is read off from it in
TauCeti/AlgebraicGeometry/AdicSpace/Spa/RationalSubset/Cover.lean.
Comparison with the open-prime approach #
TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.exists_mem_spa_supp_eq produces a point with prescribed support from an
open prime ideal, using the trivial valuation there, and the derived
isUnit_of_forall_not_vle_zero and span_eq_top_of_forall_mem_spa_exists_not_vle_zero inherit an
openness hypothesis on the maximal ideals of A. That hypothesis is unsatisfiable over a nonzero
Tate ring, where an ideal is open exactly when it is ⊤
(TauCeti.Huber.IsTateRing.isOpen_iff_eq_top), so those statements are vacuous on the affinoid
rings Wedhorn's §8 is about. The quotient-spectrum approach instead uses the following facts:
- the quotient Huber pair
(A/J, (A/J)⁺)is again a Huber pair (TauCeti.Huber.Pair.quotient), and its spectrum is empty exactly when1lies in the closure of zero (TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.spa_eq_empty_iff_one_mem_closure_zero, Wedhorn Proposition 7.49(1)); - completeness keeps a proper ideal from being dense, upstairs and downstairs alike
(
TauCeti.Huber.one_notMem_closure_zero_quotient_of_ne_top), because the unit group of a complete Huber ring is open; - a point of the quotient spectrum is a point of
Spa (A, A⁺)whose support containsJ, which is the range computationTauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.range_spaComap_quotientMk.
Completeness replaces openness of the maximal ideals, and is exactly the hypothesis Wedhorn carries.
Main results #
TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.exists_mem_spa_le_supp_of_ne_top: Wedhorn Proposition 7.51 — a proper ideal of a complete Hausdorff Huber pair is contained in the support of a point, withTauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.ne_top_iff_exists_mem_spa_le_suppthe resulting criterion.TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.exists_mem_spa_supp_eq_of_isMaximal: a maximal ideal is the support of a point.TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.span_eq_top_iff_forall_mem_spa_exists_notMem_supp: a set generates the unit ideal exactly when no point of the spectrum kills all of it.TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.isUnit_iff_forall_mem_spa_notMem_supp: Wedhorn Proposition 7.52(2), as a criterion.
References #
- T. Wedhorn, Adic Spaces (arXiv:1910.05934v1), Propositions 7.49, 7.51 and 7.52.
Provenance #
Developed here. AINTLIB reaches Propositions 7.51 and 7.52(2) through an open maximal ideal, which
is the route TauCeti/AlgebraicGeometry/AdicSpace/Spa/Points.lean carries over; the argument
below shares nothing with it beyond the statements.
Wedhorn Proposition 7.51. Every proper ideal of a complete Hausdorff Huber pair is
contained in the support of a point of Spa (A, A⁺). Wedhorn states the maximal-ideal case, where
the containment is an equality.
A proper ideal of a complete Hausdorff Huber pair is exactly one contained in the support of
some point of Spa (A, A⁺).
Wedhorn Proposition 7.51, for a maximal ideal. A maximal ideal of a complete Hausdorff
Huber pair is the support of a point of Spa (A, A⁺).
A subset of a complete Hausdorff Huber pair generates the unit ideal exactly when no point of
Spa (A, A⁺) kills all of it.
Wedhorn Proposition 7.52(2). An element of a complete Hausdorff Huber pair is a unit
exactly when no point of Spa (A, A⁺) vanishes on it.