The Kummer map of an elliptic curve and the m-descent sequence #
Let W be an elliptic curve over a field K, Kˢ a separable closure, G_K its Galois group,
and m a natural number invertible in K. The Kummer sequence
0 ⟶ E(Kˢ)[m] ⟶ E(Kˢ) ⟶ E(Kˢ) ⟶ 0
of discrete G_K-modules is WeierstrassCurve.kummerShortExact. Its degree-zero connecting map,
read through the identification WeierstrassCurve.basePointEquivInvariants of H⁰(G_K, E(Kˢ))
with E(K), is the Kummer map E(K) → H¹(G_K, E[m]). This file constructs it, computes it on
cocycles, and proves the m-descent exact sequence (Silverman VIII.2, X.4)
0 ⟶ E(K) ⧸ m E(K) ⟶ H¹(G_K, E[m]) ⟶ H¹(G_K, E)[m] ⟶ 0.
The computation is the classical one. Choose Q ∈ E(Kˢ) with m • Q = P; then σ ↦ σ Q - Q
takes values in E[m], since P is fixed by G_K, and it is a continuous 1-cocycle, its image
in E(Kˢ) being the coboundary of Q. Its class is the Kummer class of P.
The three exactness statements are read off the long exact sequence of continuous cohomology. At
E(K) ⧸ m E(K) it is exactness at H⁰(G_K, E(Kˢ)), explicitLongExact_H0C, together with the
commuting square WeierstrassCurve.explicitCoeff0_basePointEquivInvariants: multiplication by m
on the invariants is multiplication by m on E(K). At H¹(G_K, E[m]) it is exactness at the
node where δ⁰ lands, explicitLongExact_H1A. At H¹(G_K, E) it is exactness at the middle
node, explicitLongExact_H1B, together with the fact that multiplication by m on coefficients
induces multiplication by m on H¹.
The construction follows that of the Kummer map of the multiplicative group,
TauCeti.kummerMap. That map is surjective by Hilbert 90; here the cokernel H¹(G_K, E)[m] is
the m-torsion of the Weil–Châtelet group H¹(G_K, E), which is not zero in general. Over a
number field, local conditions cut the m-Selmer group out of the middle term H¹(G_K, E[m])
and the m-torsion of the Shafarevich–Tate group out of the right-hand term
H¹(G_K, E)[m].
Main definitions #
WeierstrassCurve.kummerCocycle: the cocycleσ ↦ σ Q - Qattached to anmth division point.WeierstrassCurve.kummerMap: the Kummer mapE(K) → H¹(G_K, E[m]).WeierstrassCurve.kummerClassMap: the induced map onE(K) ⧸ m E(K).WeierstrassCurve.torsionCoeffInclH1: the mapH¹(G_K, E[m]) → H¹(G_K, E)[m].
Main results #
WeierstrassCurve.kummerMap_eq_H1pi: the Kummer class ofPis the class ofσ ↦ σ Q - Q, for anyQwithm • Q = P.WeierstrassCurve.ker_kummerMap: the kernel of the Kummer map ism E(K), withWeierstrassCurve.kummerMap_eq_zero_iffthe pointwise form.WeierstrassCurve.kummerClassMap_injective:E(K) ⧸ m E(K)injects intoH¹(G_K, E[m]).WeierstrassCurve.range_kummerMap: the image of the Kummer map is the kernel ofH¹(G_K, E[m]) → H¹(G_K, E).WeierstrassCurve.range_explicitCoeff1_torsionCoeffIncl: the image ofH¹(G_K, E[m]) → H¹(G_K, E)is them-torsion ofH¹(G_K, E).WeierstrassCurve.exact_kummerClassMap_torsionCoeffInclH1,WeierstrassCurve.torsionCoeffInclH1_surjective: them-descent sequence, withWeierstrassCurve.kummerClassMap_injective, as exactness ofE(K) ⧸ m E(K) → H¹(G_K, E[m]) → H¹(G_K, E)[m]and surjectivity on the right.
References #
- J. Silverman, The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves, VIII.2 and X.4.
The map H¹(G_K, E[m]) → H¹(G_K, E)[m] #
The map H¹(G_K, E[m]) → H¹(G_K, E)[m], the last map of the m-descent sequence: the
map induced by the inclusion E(Kˢ)[m] → E(Kˢ), which lands in the m-torsion because m kills
E(Kˢ)[m]. It is surjective (WeierstrassCurve.torsionCoeffInclH1_surjective), with kernel the
image of the Kummer map (WeierstrassCurve.exact_kummerClassMap_torsionCoeffInclH1).
Instances For
The image of H¹(G_K, E[m]) → H¹(G_K, E) is the m-torsion of H¹(G_K, E), the last
exactness statement of the m-descent sequence.
H¹(G_K, E[m]) → H¹(G_K, E)[m] is surjective, the right end of the m-descent
sequence.
The Kummer cocycle #
The Kummer difference is m-torsion: if m • Q is the image of a point of E(K), then
σ Q - Q is killed by m, because G_K fixes m • Q.
The Kummer cocycle σ ↦ σ Q - Q attached to a point Q of E(Kˢ) with m • Q in
E(K).
Instances For
The Kummer cocycle is a continuous 1-cocycle: its image in E(Kˢ) is the coboundary
of Q.
The Kummer map #
The Kummer map E(K) → H¹(G_K, E[m]): the degree-zero connecting homomorphism of the
Kummer sequence of W, read on E(K) through its identification with the invariants of
E(Kˢ).
Instances For
The Kummer map is the degree-zero connecting homomorphism of the Kummer sequence, read on
P through the identification of E(K) with the invariants of E(Kˢ).
Multiplication by m on the invariants of E(Kˢ) is multiplication by m on E(K).
This is the commuting square that turns exactness of the long exact sequence at
H⁰(G_K, E(Kˢ)) into the computation of the kernel of the Kummer map.
The kernel of the Kummer map is m E(K).
The Kummer class of P is represented by σ ↦ σ Q - Q, for any Q ∈ E(Kˢ) with
m • Q = P (Silverman X.4). Such a Q exists because E(Kˢ) is divisible by m.
A point has trivial Kummer class exactly when it is divisible by m in E(K).
The Kummer map on E(K) ⧸ m E(K) #
The Kummer map on E(K) ⧸ m E(K), the first map of the m-descent sequence. It is
injective (WeierstrassCurve.kummerClassMap_injective).
Instances For
The quotient Kummer map agrees with kummerMap on representatives.
E(K) ⧸ m E(K) injects into H¹(G_K, E[m]), the kernel of the Kummer map being exactly
m E(K).
Exactness at H¹(G_K, E[m]) #
The image of the Kummer map is the kernel of H¹(G_K, E[m]) → H¹(G_K, E).
The m-descent sequence is exact at H¹(G_K, E[m]): the kernel of
H¹(G_K, E[m]) → H¹(G_K, E)[m] is the image of E(K) ⧸ m E(K) under the Kummer map. Together with
WeierstrassCurve.kummerClassMap_injective and WeierstrassCurve.torsionCoeffInclH1_surjective
this is the short exact sequence 0 → E(K) ⧸ m E(K) → H¹(G_K, E[m]) → H¹(G_K, E)[m] → 0.