Commuting faces of the cube of resolutions #
A face of the cube of resolutions of a PD-code consists of four states: s, the states t₁ and
t₂ obtained by changing s at the crossings c and c' respectively, and the state u
changed at both. Each edge carries the merge map TauCeti.PDCode.resolutionMergeMap when two
circles pass through its crossing in its source, and the split map
TauCeti.PDCode.resolutionSplitMap when two pass through it in its target. This file proves that
the two composites around a face agree whenever all four edges are merges or splits:
- both routes merge twice (associativity, including merges of disjoint pairs of circles);
- both routes split twice (coassociativity);
- one route merges and then splits while the other splits and then merges (the Frobenius relation);
- both routes merge and then split, as for two crossings joining the same two circles;
- both routes split and then merge, as for two interleaved crossings on one circle, where both
composites multiply by
2Xon that circle.
Up to exchanging the two routes, these are all the faces in which every edge is a merge or a
split: each edge changes the number of circles by one, so the numbers of circles of s and u
determine whether the routes merge twice, split twice, or do one of each.
All identities are stated for the unsigned maps, with every crossing-free circle retained; the
cube signs are supplied separately.
The proofs are algebraic. Merges along successive saddles compose to the merge along the composite
circle correspondence, and dually for splits. The mixed faces follow from the projection formula
TauCeti.Khovanov.fiberwiseSplit_fiberwiseMul_mul, which reduces each composite to multiplication
by a merged image of the split X ⊗ 1 + 1 ⊗ X of the unit. The combinatorial input is that all
four smoothings are quotients of the same half-edges, so every circle correspondence sends the
circle of a half-edge to its circle; when one state has a single circle through each crossing at
which it differs from another, TauCeti.PDCode.coarseningResolvedCircleMap compares them directly.
Main results #
All in the namespace TauCeti.PDCode:
resolutionMergeMap_comp_resolutionMergeMap_comm: faces of two merges.resolutionSplitMap_comp_resolutionSplitMap_comm: faces of two splits.resolutionSplitMap_comp_resolutionMergeMap_eq_resolutionMergeMap_comp_resolutionSplitMap: a merge followed by a split equals a split followed by a merge.resolutionSplitMap_comp_resolutionMergeMap_comm: faces in which both routes merge and then split.resolutionMergeMap_comp_resolutionSplitMap_comm: faces in which both routes split and then merge.
References #
- M. Khovanov, A categorification of the Jones polynomial, Duke Math. J. 101 (2000), §2.
- D. Bar-Natan, On Khovanov's categorification of the Jones polynomial, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 2 (2002), §2.
Associativity. If both routes around a face merge twice, the two composite merges agree:
both multiply the factors on each circle of u coming from the circles of s on it.
Coassociativity. If both routes around a face split twice, the two composite splits agree.
The Frobenius relation on a face. Merging at c and then splitting at c' equals
splitting at c' and then merging at c.
Merging and then splitting along both routes. If both routes around a face merge and then split, the two composites agree. This is the face of two crossings joining the same two circles in a planar diagram.
Splitting and then merging along both routes. If both routes around a face split and then
merge, the two composites agree: after identifying the circles of s with those of u, both
multiply by 2X on the circle of u through c and c'. This is the face of two interleaved
crossings on one circle in a planar diagram.