The Tate cohomology of the semi-local units #
Let L/K be a finite Galois extension of number fields and v a place of K. This file
computes the semi-local factors in the cohomology of the S-ideles of L. For cyclic
extensions, their Herbrand quotients together with that of the S-units give the first
fundamental inequality. For arbitrary Galois extensions, their first cohomology vanishes,
supplying the placewise input to Hilbert 90 for ideles.
For cyclic L/K, the local factors have the following properties:
- For a finite place
v ∈ S, the factor is the Galois module∏_{w ∣ v} L_wˣ, realized as the units of the semi-local algebraK_v ⊗[K] L(TauCeti.semilocalUnitsRep). Its Tate cohomology is that ofL_wˣas a representation ofGal(L_w/K_v), for any placewabovev, and its Herbrand quotient is the local degree[L_w : K_v]. - For a finite place
v ∉ S, andvunramified inL, the factor is∏_{w ∣ v} 𝒪_wˣ, realized as the integral semi-local units (TauCeti.semilocalIntegralUnitsRep). Its Tate cohomology vanishes in every degree, so it contributes nothing. - For an infinite place
v, which always lies inS, the factor is again∏_{w ∣ v} L_wˣ, the units ofK_v ⊗[K] L(TauCeti.GlobalNumberFields.infiniteSemilocalUnitsRep). Its Herbrand quotient is the local degree[L_w : K_v]:2whenvis real and the places above it are complex, and1otherwise. - Without cyclicity, at every finite and infinite place, the first Tate cohomology of the
semi-local units vanishes for any finite Galois extension, by positive-degree Shapiro
(
TauCeti.TateCohomology.coindIsoPos) and field Hilbert 90 (groupCohomology.H1ofAutOnUnitsUnique).
The cyclic computations combine three identifications. The semi-local units are coinduced from
the units of L_w as a representation of the decomposition group D_w
(TauCeti.semilocalUnitsCoindIso,
TauCeti.semilocalIntegralUnitsCoindIso for the integral units, and
TauCeti.GlobalNumberFields.infiniteSemilocalUnitsCoindIso at the infinite places), so by
Shapiro's lemma (TauCeti.TateCohomology.herbrandQuotient_coind and
TauCeti.TateCohomology.coindIso) the computation takes place over D_w. The decomposition
group is the Galois group of L_w/K_v (IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.decompositionEquiv
and NumberField.InfinitePlace.decompositionEquiv). Finally, for the cyclic local extension
L_w/K_v the Herbrand quotient of L_wˣ is [L_w : K_v]
(TauCeti.herbrandQuotient_units_eq_finrank at a finite place; at an infinite place
TauCeti.herbrandQuotient_units_eq_finrank_of_ringEquiv over K_v ≃ ℝ, and
TauCeti.herbrandQuotient_units_eq_one_of_isAlgClosed over K_v ≃ ℂ), and when L_w/K_v is
unramified the units of its ring of integers have no Tate cohomology
(TauCeti.TateCohomology.isZero_tateCohomology_unitFiltration_zero_of_isUnramified).
Main definitions #
TauCeti.ClassFieldTheory.semilocalUnitsTateCohomologyIso: Shapiro's lemma for the semi-local units at a finite place,H-hat^n(Gal(L/K), (K_v ⊗[K] L)ˣ) ≅ H-hat^n(Gal(L_w/K_v), L_wˣ)forL/Kcyclic.IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.semilocalUnitsTateCohomologyIsoPos,NumberField.InfinitePlace.infiniteSemilocalUnitsTateCohomologyIsoPos: Shapiro isomorphisms at finite and infinite places in every positive degree, without cyclicity.
Main results #
IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.isZero_tateCohomology_one_semilocalUnitsRep,NumberField.InfinitePlace.isZero_tateCohomology_one_infiniteSemilocalUnitsRep: first cohomology vanishes at every place, for any finite Galois extension, by Shapiro and field Hilbert 90.TauCeti.ClassFieldTheory.herbrandQuotient_semilocalUnitsRep:h((K_v ⊗[K] L)ˣ) = [L_w : K_v]forL/Kcyclic andvfinite.TauCeti.ClassFieldTheory.isZero_tateCohomology_semilocalIntegralUnitsRep:H-hat^n(Gal(L/K), ∏_{w ∣ v} 𝒪_wˣ) = 0forL/Kcyclic andvunramified inL; for an arbitrary Galois extension,isZero_tateCohomology_semilocalIntegralUnitsRep_of_neZerogives the same in every positive degree.TauCeti.ClassFieldTheory.herbrandQuotient_units_eq_finrank_completion:h(L_wˣ) = [L_w : K_v]for an infinite placew, as a representation ofAut(L_w/K_v).TauCeti.ClassFieldTheory.herbrandQuotient_infiniteSemilocalUnitsRep:h((K_v ⊗[K] L)ˣ) = [L_w : K_v]forL/Kcyclic andvinfinite.
References #
- J. S. Milne, Class Field Theory, v4.03, Chapter VII, Lemma 2.4, Corollary 2.6 and Proposition 2.7.
The first-cohomology computations reuse Mathlib's groupCohomology.H1ofAutOnUnitsUnique.
Shapiro's lemma for the semi-local units. For a cyclic extension L/K of number fields, a
finite place v of K and a place w of L above v, the Tate cohomology of the units of
K_v ⊗[K] L ≃ ∏_{w' ∣ v} L_{w'} as a representation of Gal(L/K) is the Tate cohomology of
L_wˣ as a representation of Gal(L_w/K_v), in every degree n : ℤ.
Instances For
The Herbrand quotient of the semi-local units. For a cyclic extension L/K of number
fields and a finite place v of K, the units of K_v ⊗[K] L ≃ ∏_{w ∣ v} L_w have Herbrand
quotient [L_w : K_v] as a representation of Gal(L/K), for any place w of L above v.
The integral semi-local units at an unramified place have no Tate cohomology. For a cyclic
extension L/K of number fields and a finite place v of K unramified in L, the units of
K_v ⊗[K] L ≃ ∏_{w ∣ v} L_w whose every component is a unit of 𝒪_w have vanishing Tate
cohomology H-hat^n(Gal(L/K), -) in every degree n : ℤ. Unramifiedness is asked of one place
w above v; the Galois group permutes the places above v transitively, so they are then all
unramified.
The integral semi-local units at an unramified place have no cohomology in positive
degrees, for an arbitrary Galois extension L/K of number fields: for a finite place v of K
unramified in L, H-hat^n(Gal(L/K), ∏_{w ∣ v} 𝒪_wˣ) = 0 for every n > 0. For a cyclic
extension this holds in every degree (isZero_tateCohomology_semilocalIntegralUnitsRep).
The Herbrand quotient of an archimedean completion. For an infinite place w of L above
the infinite place v of K, the units of L_w have Herbrand quotient [L_w : K_v] as a
representation of Aut(L_w/K_v): it is 2 when w is complex above a real v, and 1
otherwise.
The Herbrand quotient of the semi-local units at an infinite place. For a cyclic
extension L/K of number fields and an infinite place v of K, the units of
K_v ⊗[K] L ≃ ∏_{w ∣ v} L_w have Herbrand quotient [L_w : K_v] as a representation of
Gal(L/K), for any place w of L above v.
Shapiro's lemma for semi-local units in positive degrees. For any finite Galois
extension L/K of number fields and a place w above a finite place v, the semi-local
Tate cohomology at v is the cohomology of L_wˣ over Gal(L_w/K_v) in every degree n > 0.
Instances For
The first Tate cohomology of the semi-local units at a finite place vanishes, for any finite Galois extension of number fields.
Shapiro's lemma for infinite semi-local units in positive degrees. For any finite
Galois extension L/K of number fields and an infinite place w above v, the semi-local
Tate cohomology at v is the cohomology of L_wˣ over Gal(L_w/K_v) in every degree n > 0.
Instances For
The first Tate cohomology of the semi-local units at an infinite place vanishes, including at real places that become complex in the extension.