Documentation

TauCeti.RepresentationTheory.Homological.ContCohomology.Corestriction.Conjugation

Corestriction is invariant under conjugation #

Let U be an open subgroup of finite index in a profinite group G, let g : G, and let V = gUg⁻¹. Conjugation κ : V → U, v ↦ g⁻¹ v g, together with the action of g on a discrete G-module M, is a compatible pair, and so induces a map (g)_* : Hⁿ(U, M) ⟶ Hⁿ(V, M). This file proves that corestriction does not see it, in every degree:

cor_V ∘ (g)_* = cor_U : Hⁿ(U, M) ⟶ Hⁿ(G, M).

Corestriction from a subgroup therefore depends on that subgroup only through its conjugacy class, once the subgroups in the class are identified by conjugation; for instance, corestriction along a finite field extension L/K does not depend on the embedding of L into the separable closure of K (TauCeti.galoisCor_embedding_independent).

The proof runs through Shapiro's lemma, by which corestriction is the coefficient map of the trace Coind_U^G M → M read through the Shapiro isomorphism. Conjugation by g gives a G-equivariant map of coinduced modules TauCeti.DiscreteCoind.conj : Coind_U^G M → Coind_V^G M, f ↦ (x ↦ g • f (g⁻¹ x)), which commutes with the traces (TauCeti.DiscreteCoind.trace_conj). On the Shapiro side, the two ways of passing from Hⁿ(G, Coind_U^G M) to Hⁿ(V, M) differ by the compatible pair of the inner automorphism x ↦ g⁻¹ x g of G and the action of g, which acts trivially on cohomology (TauCeti.ContinuousCohomology.map_eq_id_of_inner).

For a normal subgroup V, conjugation v ↦ g⁻¹ v g of V and the action of g form a compatible pair, which induces the endomorphism (g)_* of Hⁿ(V, M) (TauCeti.ContinuousCohomology.conjNormalMap), the conjugation through which NSW (3.3.11) describes the kernel of corestriction. Under Shapiro's map it is the coefficient map of the conjugation f ↦ (x ↦ g • f (g⁻¹ x)) of Coind_V^G M.

Main definitions #

Main results #

References #

Corestriction and conjugation #

The Shapiro map intertwines conjugation: Shapiro's map for U followed by the conjugation (g)_* is the coefficient map of the conjugation Coind_U^G M → Coind_V^G M followed by Shapiro's map for V. Both are compatible-pair maps from Hⁿ(G, Coind_U^G M) to Hⁿ(V, M); they differ by the pair of the inner automorphism x ↦ g⁻¹ x g of G and the action of g, which induces the identity. Compactness ensures that the right-translation action on the discrete coinduced module is continuous.

theorem TauCeti.ContinuousCohomology.map_comp_corestriction_of_conj {G : Type u} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] [CompactSpace G] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace G] (U V : Subgroup G) (M : Type u) [AddCommGroup M] [TopologicalSpace M] [DiscreteTopology M] [DistribMulAction G M] [ContinuousSMul G M] (g : G) (κ : ↥V →ₜ* ↥U) (hκ : ∀ (v : ↥V), ↑(κ v) = g⁻¹ * ↑v * g) (f : TopRep.res (↑κ) (ofDiscreteModule ℤ (↥U) M) ⟶ ofDiscreteModule ℤ (↥V) M) (hf : ∀ (m : M), (TopRep.Hom.hom f) m = g • m) (hVU : V = Subgroup.map (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) U) (hU : IsOpen ↑U) [U.FiniteIndex] (hV : IsOpen ↑V) [V.FiniteIndex] (n : ℕ) :

Corestriction is invariant under conjugation, in every degree: for g : G, an open subgroup U of finite index and V = gUg⁻¹, corestriction from V after the conjugation (g)_* : Hⁿ(U, M) ⟶ Hⁿ(V, M) is corestriction from U. Here (g)_* is the map of the compatible pair of κ : V → U, v ↦ g⁻¹ v g, and the action of g on M; both are taken as hypotheses on their values, so that the statement applies to any presentation of the pair.

Corestriction is invariant under conjugation, in every degree: for g : G, an open subgroup U of finite index and V = gUg⁻¹, corestriction from V after the conjugation (g)_* : Hⁿ(U, M) ⟶ Hⁿ(V, M) is corestriction from U. Here (g)_* is the map of the compatible pair of κ : V → U, v ↦ g⁻¹ v g, and the action of g on M; both are taken as hypotheses on their values, so that the statement applies to any presentation of the pair.

Conjugation on the cohomology of a normal subgroup #

The compatible pair of conjugation v ↦ g⁻¹ v g of the normal subgroup V (TauCeti.ContinuousAut.conjNormal g⁻¹) and the action of g on M, which induces conjNormalMap.

Equations
Instances For
    @[simp]

    The compatible pair conjNormalPair V M g acts on M as g.

    Conjugation on the cohomology of a normal subgroup, (g)_* : Hⁿ(V, M) ⟶ Hⁿ(V, M) in every degree: the map of the compatible pair of v ↦ g⁻¹ v g and the action of g on M.

    Equations
    Instances For

      Conjugation is multiplicative: conjugation by g followed by conjugation by h is conjugation by h * g.

      Conjugation is multiplicative: conjugation by g followed by conjugation by h is conjugation by h * g.

      Shapiro's map intertwines conjugation: for a normal subgroup V, Shapiro's map followed by (g)_* is the coefficient map of the conjugation of Coind_V^G M by g, followed by Shapiro's map.

      Conjugation is natural in the coefficients: for a G-equivariant map f : M → N, the coefficient map of f on Hⁿ(V, -) commutes with (g)_*.

      Conjugation with trivial coefficients is the pullback along v ↦ g⁻¹ v g alone: when G acts trivially on M, (g)_* is the map of the compatible pair of this conjugation and the identity of M.

      Trivial 𝔽₂ coefficients #

      theorem TauCeti.trivialF2Map_comp_trivialF2CorMap_of_conj {G : Type u} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] [CompactSpace G] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace G] {U V : Subgroup G} (hU : IsOpen ↑U) [U.FiniteIndex] (hV : IsOpen ↑V) [V.FiniteIndex] (g : G) (hVU : V = Subgroup.map (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) U) (κ : ↥V →ₜ* ↥U) (hκ : ∀ (v : ↥V), ↑(κ v) = g⁻¹ * ↑v * g) (n : ℕ) :

      Corestriction with trivial 𝔽₂ coefficients is invariant under conjugation, in every degree: for g : G, an open subgroup U of finite index and V = gUg⁻¹, pullback along any continuous κ : V → U with κ v = g⁻¹ v g followed by corestriction from V is corestriction from U.

      Corestriction with trivial 𝔽₂ coefficients is invariant under conjugation, in every degree: for g : G, an open subgroup U of finite index and V = gUg⁻¹, pullback along any continuous κ : V → U with κ v = g⁻¹ v g followed by corestriction from V is corestriction from U.

      Degree two in the explicit model #

      theorem TauCeti.ContCohomology.explicitCor2_explicitMap2_of_conj {G : Type u} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] [CompactSpace G] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace G] (U V : Subgroup G) (M : Type u) [AddCommGroup M] [TopologicalSpace M] [DiscreteTopology M] [DistribMulAction G M] [ContinuousSMul G M] (g : G) (κ : ↥V →ₜ* ↥U) (hκ : ∀ (v : ↥V), ↑(κ v) = g⁻¹ * ↑v * g) (f : M →+ M) (hf : ∀ (m : M), f m = g • m) (hVU : V = Subgroup.map (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) U) (hU : IsOpen ↑U) [U.FiniteIndex] (hV : IsOpen ↑V) [V.FiniteIndex] (x : H2 (↥U) M) :
      (explicitCor2 G M V hV) ((explicitMap2 (↥U) M (↥V) M κ f ⋯ ⋯) x) = (explicitCor2 G M U hU) x

      Degree-two corestriction is invariant under conjugation, in the explicit inhomogeneous model: for g : G, an open subgroup U of finite index and V = gUg⁻¹, the explicit corestriction from V after the conjugation (g)_* : H²(U, M) → H²(V, M) is the explicit corestriction from U. As in TauCeti.ContinuousCohomology.map_comp_corestriction_of_conj, (g)_* is the map of the compatible pair of κ : V → U, v ↦ g⁻¹ v g, and the action f of g on M, both given through their values.