Documentation

TauCeti.AlgebraicGeometry.AdicSpace.Spa.StructurePresheaf.LaurentCover.Restrict

The Laurent cover restricted to a rational subset #

Let W = R(T/s) be a rational subset of X = Spa(A, A⁺) and f ∈ A. The two pieces W ∩ {|f| ≤ 1} and W ∩ {|f| ≥ 1} cover W. When A is a strongly noetherian Tate ring and A⁺ consists of power-bounded elements, the augmented two-piece Čech sequence of the presentation-limit presheaf for this cover of W is exact: a section over W is determined by its restrictions to the two pieces, sections over the pieces that agree on their overlap come from a section over W, and every section over the overlap is a difference of restrictions from the pieces. For W = X and complete Hausdorff A this is Wedhorn's Lemma 8.33, proved in TauCeti.AlgebraicGeometry.AdicSpace.Spa.StructurePresheaf.LaurentCover.Basic.

The general case is the first step of the proof of Wedhorn's Lemma 8.34(i). Let B = A⟨T/s⟩ with plus ring A_U⁺, and let j : Spa(B, A_U⁺) → X be induced by the structure map ρ : A → B (pullback along j is locOpensComap). Then j⁻¹(W) is all of Spa(B, A_U⁺), and j⁻¹ carries the Laurent cover of f to the Laurent cover of ρ(f) (locOpensComap_laurentCoverOpen). Wedhorn's Remark 8.4 (presentationLimitLocIso) identifies the presentation limits over rational opens V ⊆ W with those over j⁻¹(V), compatibly with restriction. Since B is again a complete Hausdorff strongly noetherian Tate ring, Lemma 8.33 for B transports to the restricted cover. In particular A itself need not be complete.

Main results #

References #

Pulling back the Laurent cover #

theorem TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.locOpensComap_laurentCoverOpen {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [UniformSpace A] [IsTopologicalRing A] (P : Huber.PairOfDefinition A) (Aplus : Subring A) (T : Finset A) (s : A) (S : Type v) [CommRing S] [Algebra A S] [IsLocalization.Away s S] (hden : P.HasDenominatorPower T s S) (f : A) (b : Bool) :
locOpensComap P Aplus T s S hden (laurentCoverOpen Aplus f b) = laurentCoverOpen (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden) ((P.toCompletionLoc T s S hden) f) b

The Laurent cover pulled back to a rational subset. Pulling the Laurent piece laurentCoverOpen Aplus f b back along Spa(A⟨T/s⟩, A_U⁺) → Spa(A, A⁺) gives the corresponding Laurent piece of the image of f in A⟨T/s⟩.

theorem TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.locOpensComap_inf_laurentCoverOpen {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [UniformSpace A] [IsTopologicalRing A] (P : Huber.PairOfDefinition A) (Aplus : Subring A) (T : Finset A) (s : A) (S : Type v) [CommRing S] [Algebra A S] [IsLocalization.Away s S] (hden : P.HasDenominatorPower T s S) (f : A) (b : Bool) :
locOpensComap P Aplus T s S hden (spaBasicOpen Aplus T s ⊓ laurentCoverOpen Aplus f b) = laurentCoverOpen (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden) ((P.toCompletionLoc T s S hden) f) b

The pullback of the Laurent piece of f restricted to R(T/s) is the Laurent piece of the image of f, since the pullback of R(T/s) is the whole localized spectrum.

Transport along Wedhorn's Remark 8.4 #

theorem TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.injective_presentationLimitMap_of_locOpensComap {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [TopologicalSpace A] [IsTopologicalRing A] (P : Huber.PairOfDefinition A) (Aplus : Subring A) (T : Finset A) (s : A) (S : Type v) [CommRing S] [Algebra A S] [IsLocalization.Away s S] (hden : P.HasDenominatorPower T s S) (hAplus : ∀ ⦃a : A⦄, a ∈ Aplus → Huber.IsPowerBounded a) (hT : IsOpen ↑(Ideal.span ↑T)) {ι : Type u_1} {U : ι → TopologicalSpace.Opens ↑(spa Aplus)} (hU : ∀ (i : ι), U i ∈ spaRationalOpens Aplus) (hUW : ∀ (i : ι), U i ≤ spaBasicOpen Aplus T s) {W' : TopologicalSpace.Opens ↑(spa (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden))} {U' : ι → TopologicalSpace.Opens ↑(spa (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden))} :
locOpensComap P Aplus T s S hden (spaBasicOpen Aplus T s) = W' → (∀ (i : ι), locOpensComap P Aplus T s S hden (U i) = U' i) → ∀ (hU'W' : ∀ (i : ι), U' i ≤ W'), (Function.Injective fun (y : (presentationLimit (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden) W').obj.α) (i : ι) => ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom y) → Function.Injective fun (x : (presentationLimit Aplus (spaBasicOpen Aplus T s)).obj.α) (i : ι) => ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom x

Injectivity transported along rational localization. Restriction from R(T/s) to rational opens U i ⊆ R(T/s) is injective as soon as restriction from the pullback of R(T/s) to the pullbacks of the U i is injective.

theorem TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.exists_presentationLimitMap_eq_of_locOpensComap {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [TopologicalSpace A] [IsTopologicalRing A] (P : Huber.PairOfDefinition A) (Aplus : Subring A) (T : Finset A) (s : A) (S : Type v) [CommRing S] [Algebra A S] [IsLocalization.Away s S] (hden : P.HasDenominatorPower T s S) (hAplus : ∀ ⦃a : A⦄, a ∈ Aplus → Huber.IsPowerBounded a) (hT : IsOpen ↑(Ideal.span ↑T)) {U : Bool → TopologicalSpace.Opens ↑(spa Aplus)} (hU : ∀ (b : Bool), U b ∈ spaRationalOpens Aplus) (hUW : ∀ (b : Bool), U b ≤ spaBasicOpen Aplus T s) {W' O' : TopologicalSpace.Opens ↑(spa (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden))} {U' : Bool → TopologicalSpace.Opens ↑(spa (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden))} :
locOpensComap P Aplus T s S hden (spaBasicOpen Aplus T s) = W' → (∀ (b : Bool), locOpensComap P Aplus T s S hden (U b) = U' b) → locOpensComap P Aplus T s S hden (U true ⊓ U false) = O' → ∀ (hU'W' : ∀ (b : Bool), U' b ≤ W') (h₁ : O' ≤ U' true) (h₂ : O' ≤ U' false), (∀ (y : (b : Bool) → (presentationLimit (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden) (U' b)).obj.α), ↑(presentationLimitMap h₁).hom (y true) = ↑(presentationLimitMap h₂).hom (y false) → ∃ (c : (presentationLimit (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden) W').obj.α), ∀ (b : Bool), ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom c = y b) → ∀ (x : (b : Bool) → (presentationLimit Aplus (U b)).obj.α), ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom (x true) = ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom (x false) → ∃ (a : (presentationLimit Aplus (spaBasicOpen Aplus T s)).obj.α), ∀ (b : Bool), ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom a = x b

Gluing transported along rational localization. Sections over two rational opens U b ⊆ R(T/s) that agree on their overlap glue over R(T/s) as soon as the analogous gluing statement holds for the pullbacks of R(T/s), the U b, and their overlap.

The Laurent cover transported along Wedhorn's Remark 8.4 #

theorem TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.injective_presentationLimitMap_inf_laurentCoverOpen_of_locOpensComap {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [UniformSpace A] [IsTopologicalRing A] (P : Huber.PairOfDefinition A) (Aplus : Subring A) (T : Finset A) (s : A) (S : Type v) [CommRing S] [Algebra A S] [IsLocalization.Away s S] (hden : P.HasDenominatorPower T s S) (hAplus : ∀ ⦃a : A⦄, a ∈ Aplus → Huber.IsPowerBounded a) (hT : IsOpen ↑(Ideal.span ↑T)) (f : A) :
(Function.Injective fun (y : (presentationLimit (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden) ⊤).obj.α) (b : Bool) => ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom y) → Function.Injective fun (x : (presentationLimit Aplus (spaBasicOpen Aplus T s)).obj.α) (b : Bool) => ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom x

Laurent injectivity transported along rational localization. If a section over the adic spectrum of A⟨T/s⟩ is determined by its restrictions to the Laurent cover of the image of f, then a section over R(T/s) is determined by its restrictions to the two pieces R(T/s) ⊓ laurentCoverOpen Aplus f b.

theorem TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.exists_presentationLimitMap_eq_of_inf_laurentCoverOpen_of_locOpensComap {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [UniformSpace A] [IsTopologicalRing A] (P : Huber.PairOfDefinition A) (Aplus : Subring A) (T : Finset A) (s : A) (S : Type v) [CommRing S] [Algebra A S] [IsLocalization.Away s S] (hden : P.HasDenominatorPower T s S) (hAplus : ∀ ⦃a : A⦄, a ∈ Aplus → Huber.IsPowerBounded a) (hT : IsOpen ↑(Ideal.span ↑T)) (f : A) :
(∀ (y : (b : Bool) → (presentationLimit (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden) (laurentCoverOpen (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden) ((P.toCompletionLoc T s S hden) f) b)).obj.α), ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom (y true) = ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom (y false) → ∃ (c : (presentationLimit (P.completedPlusSubring Aplus T s S hden) ⊤).obj.α), ∀ (b : Bool), ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom c = y b) → ∀ (x : (b : Bool) → (presentationLimit Aplus (spaBasicOpen Aplus T s ⊓ laurentCoverOpen Aplus f b)).obj.α), ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom (x true) = ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom (x false) → ∃ (a : (presentationLimit Aplus (spaBasicOpen Aplus T s)).obj.α), ∀ (b : Bool), ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom a = x b

Laurent gluing transported along rational localization. If compatible sections over the Laurent cover of the image of f in A⟨T/s⟩ glue over its adic spectrum, then sections over the two pieces R(T/s) ⊓ laurentCoverOpen Aplus f b that agree on their overlap come from a section over R(T/s).

Lemma 8.33 on a rational subset #

theorem TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.injective_presentationLimitMap_inf_laurentCoverOpen {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [UniformSpace A] [IsTopologicalRing A] [Huber.IsTateRing A] [Huber.IsStronglyNoetherian A] (P : Huber.PairOfDefinition A) {Aplus : Subring A} (hAplus : ∀ ⦃a : A⦄, a ∈ Aplus → Huber.IsPowerBounded a) {T : Finset A} {s : A} (hT : IsOpen ↑(Ideal.span ↑T)) (f : A) :
Function.Injective fun (x : (presentationLimit Aplus (spaBasicOpen Aplus T s)).obj.α) (b : Bool) => ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom x

Wedhorn's Lemma 8.33 on a rational subset, injectivity. Let A be a strongly noetherian Tate ring, A⁺ a subring of power-bounded elements, R(T/s) a rational subset of Spa(A, A⁺) and f ∈ A. A section of presentationLimit over R(T/s) is determined by its restrictions to the two pieces R(T/s) ⊓ laurentCoverOpen Aplus f b of the Laurent cover of f restricted to R(T/s). For the Laurent cover of the whole adic spectrum of a complete Hausdorff A, see injective_presentationLimitMap_laurentCoverOpen.

theorem TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.exists_presentationLimitMap_eq_of_inf_laurentCoverOpen {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [UniformSpace A] [IsTopologicalRing A] [Huber.IsTateRing A] [Huber.IsStronglyNoetherian A] (P : Huber.PairOfDefinition A) {Aplus : Subring A} (hAplus : ∀ ⦃a : A⦄, a ∈ Aplus → Huber.IsPowerBounded a) {T : Finset A} {s : A} (hT : IsOpen ↑(Ideal.span ↑T)) (f : A) (x : (b : Bool) → (presentationLimit Aplus (spaBasicOpen Aplus T s ⊓ laurentCoverOpen Aplus f b)).obj.α) (hx : ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom (x true) = ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom (x false)) :
∃ (a : (presentationLimit Aplus (spaBasicOpen Aplus T s)).obj.α), ∀ (b : Bool), ↑(presentationLimitMap ⋯).hom a = x b

Wedhorn's Lemma 8.33 on a rational subset, gluing. Let A be a strongly noetherian Tate ring, A⁺ a subring of power-bounded elements, R(T/s) a rational subset of Spa(A, A⁺) and f ∈ A. Sections x b of presentationLimit over the two pieces R(T/s) ⊓ laurentCoverOpen Aplus f b that agree on their overlap are the restrictions of one section over R(T/s), which is unique by injective_presentationLimitMap_inf_laurentCoverOpen. For the Laurent cover of the whole adic spectrum of a complete Hausdorff A, see exists_presentationLimitMap_eq_of_laurentCoverOpen.

Wedhorn's Lemma 8.33 on a rational subset, degree-one surjectivity. Let A be a strongly noetherian Tate ring, A⁺ a subring of power-bounded elements, R(T/s) a rational subset of Spa(A, A⁺) and f ∈ A. Every section of presentationLimit over the overlap of the two pieces R(T/s) ⊓ laurentCoverOpen Aplus f b is the difference of the restrictions of sections over the pieces. Together with injective_presentationLimitMap_inf_laurentCoverOpen and exists_presentationLimitMap_eq_of_inf_laurentCoverOpen, this is exactness of the augmented Čech complex of the Laurent cover of f restricted to R(T/s). For the Laurent cover of the whole adic spectrum of a complete Hausdorff A, see surjective_presentationLimitMap_sub_laurentCoverOpen.