The sheaf condition for Laurent covers #
Let X = Spa(A, A⁺), let W be an open subset of X and let T ⊆ A be finite. The Laurent
cover of W generated by T consists of the pieces
W ∩ {v | v(t) ≤ 1 for t ∈ T \ J, v(t) ≥ 1 for t ∈ J}, J ⊆ T,
and the sieve it generates is laurentSieve Aplus T W: the opens V ≤ W on which every t ∈ T
has a fixed sign, that is, V ≤ {|t| ≤ 1} or V ≤ {|t| ≥ 1}. Phrasing the cover as a sieve
avoids indexing its pieces by sign sets, and restricting it to an open V ≤ W gives the Laurent
sieve of V (laurentSieve_pullback).
A presheaf of sets on X that satisfies the sheaf condition for the two-piece Laurent covers
W ∩ {|f| ≤ 1}, W ∩ {|f| ≥ 1} of every rational subset W satisfies it for the Laurent cover
of every rational subset generated by a finite set (isSheafFor_laurentSieve_of_isSheafFor).
This is the induction of Wedhorn's Lemma 8.34(i), which uses
TauCeti.TopologicalSpace.Opens.isSheafFor_trans.
When A is a strongly noetherian Tate ring, A⁺ consists of power-bounded elements and W is a
rational subset, the presentation-limit presheaf satisfies the sheaf condition for the two-piece
cover (isSheafFor_ofArrows_inf_laurentCoverOpen, Lemma 8.33), hence for the Laurent sieve
(isSheafFor_laurentSieve): sections over the pieces of the Laurent cover that agree on overlaps
glue uniquely to a section over W. This is the degree-zero part of Wedhorn's Lemma 8.34(i), that
Laurent covers are acyclic.
The rest of Wedhorn's proof of Lemma 8.34 passes to rational localisations, so it applies to any
class of Tate rings that is stable under rational localisation and satisfies Lemma 8.33 on rational
subsets. LaurentGluing packages these two hypotheses on a predicate on Tate rings, and strong
noetherianness satisfies them (laurentGluing_isStronglyNoetherian).
Main definitions #
TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.LaurentGluing: the hypotheses on a predicate on Tate rings under which Wedhorn's reduction of Lemma 8.34 to Laurent covers runs.
Main results #
TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.isSheafFor_laurentSieve_of_isSheafFor: a presheaf of sets satisfying the sheaf condition for two-piece Laurent covers of rational subsets satisfies it for every Laurent sieve of a rational subset.TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.isSheafFor_ofArrows_inf_laurentCoverOpen: over a strongly noetherian Tate ring, the presentation-limit presheaf satisfies the sheaf condition for the two-piece Laurent cover of a rational subset.TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.isSheafFor_laurentSieve: the presentation-limit presheaf, as a presheaf of sets, satisfies the sheaf condition for the Laurent sieve of a rational subset.TauCeti.ValuationSpectrum.laurentGluing_isStronglyNoetherian: strong noetherianness satisfiesLaurentGluing.
References #
- T. Wedhorn, Adic Spaces (arXiv:1910.05934v1), Lemma 8.33 and Lemma 8.34(i).
- S. Bosch, U. Güntzer, R. Remmert, Non-Archimedean Analysis, §8.2.2, Lemma 2, the rigid-analytic original of the induction.
The induction over the generators #
The induction of Wedhorn's Lemma 8.34(i). Let F be a presheaf of sets on Spa(A, A⁺)
that satisfies the sheaf condition for the two-piece Laurent cover W ∩ {|f| ≤ 1},
W ∩ {|f| ≥ 1} of every rational subset W and every f ∈ A. Then F satisfies the sheaf
condition for the Laurent cover of every rational subset generated by a finite set T ⊆ A.
The strongly noetherian case #
Wedhorn's Lemma 8.33 on a rational subset, as a sheaf condition. Let A be a strongly
noetherian Tate ring, A⁺ a subring of power-bounded elements, W a rational subset of
Spa(A, A⁺) and f ∈ A. The presentation-limit presheaf, as a presheaf of sets, satisfies the
sheaf condition for the two-piece Laurent cover W ∩ {|f| ≤ 1}, W ∩ {|f| ≥ 1} of W.
Wedhorn's Lemma 8.34(i) in degree zero: the sheaf condition for Laurent covers. Let A be
a strongly noetherian Tate ring, A⁺ a subring of power-bounded elements, W a rational subset
of Spa(A, A⁺) and T ⊆ A finite. The presentation-limit presheaf, as a presheaf of sets,
satisfies the sheaf condition for the Laurent cover of W generated by T: sections over the
opens of laurentSieve Aplus T W that are compatible under restriction glue uniquely to a section
over W. A itself need not be complete.
Predicates on Tate rings admitting Laurent gluing #
The hypotheses of Wedhorn's reduction to Laurent covers, on a predicate C on Tate rings.
Cpasses from a Tate ringAto each completed rational localisationA⟨T/s⟩for whichTspans an open ideal, with the topologylocUniformSpacebuilt from a pair of definition.- On every Tate ring
AsatisfyingC, and for every subringA⁺of power-bounded elements, the presentation-limit presheaf of sets ofSpa(A, A⁺)satisfies the sheaf condition for the two-piece Laurent coverW ∩ {|f| ≤ 1},W ∩ {|f| ≥ 1}of every rational subsetWand everyf ∈ A. This is Wedhorn's Lemma 8.33 on rational subsets, in degree zero.
For such a C, Wedhorn's proof of Lemma 8.34 shows that over a Tate ring satisfying C every
cover of a rational subset by rational subsets satisfies the sheaf condition
(isSheafFor_ofArrows_spaRationalOpens_of_iSup_eq_of_laurentGluing). Strong noetherianness is an
example (laurentGluing_isStronglyNoetherian).
- completion_localization {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [UniformSpace A] [IsTopologicalRing A] [Huber.IsTateRing A] (P : Huber.PairOfDefinition A) (T : Finset A) (s : A) (hT : IsOpen ↑(Ideal.span ↑T)) : C A → let hden := ⋯; C (UniformSpace.Completion (Localization.Away s))
Cpasses to completed rational localisations. - isSheafFor_ofArrows_inf_laurentCoverOpen {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [UniformSpace A] [IsTopologicalRing A] [Huber.IsTateRing A] (P : Huber.PairOfDefinition A) {Aplus : Subring A} : C A → (∀ ⦃a : A⦄, a ∈ Aplus → Huber.IsPowerBounded a) → ∀ {W : TopologicalSpace.Opens ↑(spa Aplus)}, W ∈ spaRationalOpens Aplus → ∀ (f : A), CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSheafFor ((presentationLimitPresheaf P Aplus).comp (TopCommRingCat.isCompleteSeparated.ι.comp (CategoryTheory.forget TopCommRingCat))) (CategoryTheory.Presieve.ofArrows (fun (b : Bool) => W ⊓ laurentCoverOpen Aplus f b) fun (x : Bool) => CategoryTheory.homOfLE ⋯)
Over a Tate ring satisfying
C, two-piece Laurent covers of rational subsets glue.
Instances For
Strong noetherianness admits Laurent gluing. A completed rational localisation of a
strongly noetherian Tate ring is strongly noetherian
(TauCeti.Huber.PairOfDefinition.isStronglyNoetherian_completion), and over a strongly noetherian
Tate ring two-piece Laurent covers of rational subsets glue
(isSheafFor_ofArrows_inf_laurentCoverOpen).